AOM vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
AOM and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Moderate. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both AOM and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AOM or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between AOM and VOO is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AOM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AOM:
0.95
VOO:
0.59
AOM:
1.42
VOO:
0.94
AOM:
1.19
VOO:
1.14
AOM:
1.21
VOO:
0.60
AOM:
5.05
VOO:
2.34
AOM:
1.57%
VOO:
4.80%
AOM:
8.32%
VOO:
19.10%
AOM:
-19.96%
VOO:
-33.99%
AOM:
-1.10%
VOO:
-8.16%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOM achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -3.92% return. Over the past 10 years, AOM has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 4.61%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.
AOM
1.79%
5.27%
1.26%
7.34%
5.30%
4.61%
VOO
-3.92%
11.29%
-4.41%
9.97%
15.75%
12.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AOM vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AOM vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AOM
VOO
AOM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AOM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
AOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than VOO's 1.35% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 3.12% | 3.10% | 2.79% | 2.27% | 1.56% | 2.02% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 1.98% | 2.08% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.35% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% |
Drawdowns
AOM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOM drawdown since its inception was -19.96%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOM and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AOM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) is 4.75%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that AOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.