AOM vs. VSCGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AOM (iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF) and VSCGX (Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, AOM returned 6.22%/yr vs 6.62%/yr for VSCGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AOM charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VSCGX.

Performance

AOM vs. VSCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOM achieves a 5.00% return, which is significantly lower than VSCGX's 5.65% return. Over the past 10 years, AOM has underperformed VSCGX with an annualized return of 6.22%, while VSCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.62% annualized return.

AOM

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 2.13%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 5.31%
• 1Y: 14.51%
• 3Y*: 10.87%
• 5Y*: 4.80%
• 10Y*: 6.22%

VSCGX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 2.69%
• YTD: 5.65%
• 6M: 5.96%
• 1Y: 14.61%
• 3Y*: 12.39%
• 5Y*: 5.61%
• 10Y*: 6.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOM vs. VSCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF	5.00%	13.28%	7.95%	12.38%	-14.54%	6.93%	10.02%	15.58%	-3.88%	11.63%
VSCGX Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund	5.65%	12.87%	11.65%	12.72%	-15.00%	6.04%	11.51%	15.69%	-2.95%	10.02%

Correlation

The correlation between AOM and VSCGX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2008	0.90

The correlation between AOM and VSCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

AOM vs. VSCGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AOM	VSCGX
Technology	27.9%	27.4%
Financial Services	16.1%	16.1%
Industrials	11.9%	12.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	9.4%
Communication Services	8.1%	8.0%
Healthcare	8.0%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	4.8%
Energy	4.3%	4.3%
Basic Materials	4.2%	4.3%
Utilities	2.7%	2.7%
Real Estate	2.4%	2.5%

Return for Risk

AOM vs. VSCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOM

AOM Risk / Return Rank: 65
AOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
AOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
AOM Omega Ratio Rank: 67
AOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
AOM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

VSCGX

VSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 65
VSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
VSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
VSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
VSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOM vs. VSCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AOM	VSCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	2.40	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.22	3.49	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.47	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	2.85	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.45	12.45	0.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOM vs. VSCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the VSCGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOM and VSCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOM	VSCGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23	2.40	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.73	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.90	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.85	-0.16

Drawdowns

AOM vs. VSCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOM drawdown since its inception was -19.96%, smaller than the maximum VSCGX drawdown of -30.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOM and VSCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOM	VSCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.96%	-30.62%	+10.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.11%	-5.19%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.85%	-6.71%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.96%	-20.15%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.96%	-20.15%	+0.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	0.00%	-0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.70%	-3.00%	+0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.17%	1.18%	-0.01%

Volatility

AOM vs. VSCGX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) and Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) have volatilities of 2.17% and 2.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOM	VSCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.17%	2.17%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.22%	5.09%	+0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.55%	6.16%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.14%	7.70%	+0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.93%	7.37%	+0.56%

AOM vs. VSCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOM has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VSCGX's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AOM vs. VSCGX - Dividend Comparison

AOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than VSCGX's 5.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF	2.98%	2.98%	3.10%	2.79%	2.27%	1.56%	2.02%	2.66%	2.53%	3.31%	2.14%	1.98%
VSCGX Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund	5.24%	5.50%	11.03%	5.23%	2.79%	4.18%	3.28%	2.62%	3.81%	1.65%	2.43%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOM and VSCGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, AOM and VSCGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AOM or VSCGX?

VSCGX has higher volatility (2.17%) compared to AOM (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOM dropped -19.96% vs VSCGX's -30.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VSCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.