NCIQ vs. LRGF
NCIQ (Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF) and LRGF (iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NCIQ is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Nasdaq Crypto US Settlement Price™ Index, while LRGF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NCIQ returned -46.49% vs 19.69% for LRGF. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NCIQ charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for LRGF.
Performance
NCIQ vs. LRGF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCIQ achieves a -35.77% return, which is significantly lower than LRGF's 7.65% return.
NCIQ
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -22.38%
- YTD
- -35.77%
- 6M
- -35.67%
- 1Y
- -46.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRGF
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 19.69%
- 3Y*
- 21.33%
- 5Y*
- 13.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.34%
NCIQ vs. LRGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NCIQ Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF | -35.77% | -13.57% |
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 7.65% | 10.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between NCIQ and LRGF is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NCIQ vs. LRGF — Risk / Return Rank
NCIQ
LRGF
NCIQ vs. LRGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NCIQ | LRGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.28 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 2.22 | -3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 8.84 | -10.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NCIQ vs. LRGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCIQ drawdown since its inception was -57.05%, which is greater than LRGF's maximum drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCIQ and LRGF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCIQ | LRGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.05% | -36.03% | -21.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.05% | -8.92% | -48.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.05% | -3.27% | -53.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.60% | -4.53% | -19.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.64% | 2.23% | +31.41% |
Volatility
NCIQ vs. LRGF - Volatility Comparison
Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) has a higher volatility of 14.32% compared to iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) at 4.67%. This indicates that NCIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NCIQ | LRGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.32% | 4.67% | +9.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.71% | 9.86% | +26.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.10% | 12.56% | +35.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.09% | 17.10% | +30.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.09% | 18.32% | +29.77% |
NCIQ vs. LRGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCIQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LRGF's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NCIQ vs. LRGF - Dividend Comparison
NCIQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 1.10% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.76% | 3.27% | 1.68% | 1.56% | 0.83% |
NCIQ Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NCIQ and LRGF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NCIQ has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to LRGF (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NCIQ dropped -57.05% vs LRGF's -36.03%.
On 1-year performance, LRGF leads with 19.69% vs -46.49% for NCIQ. On fees, LRGF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, LRGF has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LRGF has performed better with a 19.69% return vs -46.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LRGF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NCIQ.
LRGF has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.00% for NCIQ.
NCIQ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while LRGF is Large Cap Blend Equities. NCIQ tracks Nasdaq Crypto US Settlement Price™ Index, while LRGF tracks MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor. They also come from different issuers: Hashdex and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NCIQ and 0.20% for LRGF.
LRGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NCIQ and LRGF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer