NCIQ vs. VTI
Compare and contrast key facts about Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI).
NCIQ and VTI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NCIQ is a passively managed fund by Hashdex that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Crypto US Settlement Price™ Index. It was launched on Feb 13, 2025. VTI is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Total Market Index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2016. Both NCIQ and VTI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
NCIQ vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NCIQ vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NCIQ Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF | -24.20% | -10.21% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | -4.01% | 12.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NCIQ achieves a -24.20% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's -4.01% return.
NCIQ
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- -24.20%
- 6M
- -44.20%
- 1Y
- -17.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- -4.01%
- 6M
- -1.66%
- 1Y
- 18.11%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NCIQ vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NCIQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
NCIQ vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
NCIQ
VTI
NCIQ vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NCIQ | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | 0.96 | -1.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | 1.48 | -1.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.23 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 1.52 | -1.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 7.26 | -8.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NCIQ | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | 0.96 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | 0.48 | -1.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between NCIQ and VTI is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NCIQ vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
NCIQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NCIQ Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.17% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
NCIQ vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NCIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.90%, roughly equal to the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCIQ and VTI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NCIQ | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.90% | -55.45% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.90% | -12.30% | -40.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.31% | -6.25% | -43.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.35% | -8.08% | -10.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.85% | 2.58% | +22.27% |
Volatility
NCIQ vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) has a higher volatility of 13.78% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 5.45%. This indicates that NCIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NCIQ | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.78% | 5.45% | +8.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.14% | 9.73% | +30.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.13% | 19.01% | +30.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.71% | 17.42% | +32.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.71% | 18.29% | +31.42% |