PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NCIQ vs. BITW
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NCIQ vs. BITW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and Bitwise 10 Crypto Index Fund (BITW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NCIQ vs. BITW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NCIQ
Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF
-24.20%-10.21%
BITW
Bitwise 10 Crypto Index Fund
-24.09%-1.06%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NCIQ having a -24.20% return and BITW slightly higher at -24.09%.


NCIQ

1D
2.01%
1M
3.40%
YTD
-24.20%
6M
-44.20%
1Y
-17.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITW

1D
2.22%
1M
3.64%
YTD
-24.09%
6M
-43.36%
1Y
-10.64%
3Y*
59.71%
5Y*
-11.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NCIQ vs. BITW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCIQ
NCIQ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
NCIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NCIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NCIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NCIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
NCIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BITW
BITW Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BITW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITW Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BITW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITW Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCIQ vs. BITW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and Bitwise 10 Crypto Index Fund (BITW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NCIQBITWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.36

-0.21

-0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.20

0.06

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.01

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

-0.22

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.76

-0.48

-0.28

NCIQ vs. BITW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCIQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the BITW Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCIQ and BITW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NCIQBITWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

-0.21

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.59

0.25

-0.84

Correlation

The correlation between NCIQ and BITW is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NCIQ vs. BITW - Dividend Comparison

Neither NCIQ nor BITW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NCIQ vs. BITW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.90%, smaller than the maximum BITW drawdown of -96.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCIQ and BITW.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NCIQBITWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.90%

-96.46%

+43.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.90%

-52.10%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.31%

-67.91%

+18.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.35%

-69.75%

+51.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.85%

24.33%

+0.52%

Volatility

NCIQ vs. BITW - Volatility Comparison

Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and Bitwise 10 Crypto Index Fund (BITW) have volatilities of 13.78% and 13.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NCIQBITWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.78%

13.93%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.14%

41.70%

-1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.13%

51.74%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.71%

67.66%

-17.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.71%

110.32%

-60.61%