NCIQ vs. BTCZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ).

NCIQ and BTCZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NCIQ is a passively managed fund by Hashdex that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Crypto US Settlement Price™ Index. It was launched on Feb 13, 2025. BTCZ is an actively managed fund by T-Rex. It was launched on Jul 9, 2024.

Performance

NCIQ vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NCIQ vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NCIQ Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF	-23.64%	-10.21%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	28.74%	-18.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NCIQ achieves a -23.64% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 28.74% return.

NCIQ

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -1.26%
• YTD: -23.64%
• 6M: -45.48%
• 1Y: -19.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCZ

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -1.54%
• YTD: 28.74%
• 6M: 102.65%
• 1Y: -11.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NCIQ vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NCIQ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

BTCZ

T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF

NCIQ

Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF

Return for Risk

NCIQ vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NCIQ

NCIQ Risk / Return Rank: 6
NCIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
NCIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
NCIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NCIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
NCIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BTCZ

BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 12
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 16
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NCIQ vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NCIQ	BTCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.40	-0.13	-0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.27	0.45	-0.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.05	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	-0.26	-0.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	-0.36	-0.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NCIQ vs. BTCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NCIQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the BTCZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NCIQ and BTCZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NCIQ	BTCZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40	-0.13	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.58	-0.60	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between NCIQ and BTCZ is -0.99. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

NCIQ vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

NCIQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

	TTM	2025	2024
NCIQ Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.08%

Drawdowns

NCIQ vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NCIQ drawdown since its inception was -52.90%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NCIQ and BTCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NCIQ	BTCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.90%	-91.06%	+38.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.90%	-68.27%	+15.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.93%	-79.24%	+30.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.46%	-72.75%	+54.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.05%	48.60%	-23.55%

Volatility

NCIQ vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF (NCIQ) is 13.66%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a volatility of 26.38%. This indicates that NCIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NCIQ	BTCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.66%	26.38%	-12.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.15%	73.37%	-33.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.10%	90.72%	-41.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.63%	99.57%	-49.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.63%	99.57%	-49.94%