PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NC vs. DHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NC vs. DHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NACCO Industries, Inc. (NC) and DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NC achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly lower than DHT's 57.30% return. Over the past 10 years, NC has underperformed DHT with an annualized return of 1.44%, while DHT has yielded a comparatively higher 22.60% annualized return.


NC

1D
-0.15%
1M
5.41%
YTD
6.46%
6M
7.03%
1Y
29.70%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
17.69%
10Y*
1.44%

DHT

1D
-6.76%
1M
3.91%
YTD
57.30%
6M
58.60%
1Y
76.38%
3Y*
43.05%
5Y*
30.99%
10Y*
22.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NC vs. DHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NC
NACCO Industries, Inc.
6.46%68.74%-15.91%-1.51%6.71%42.16%-42.27%40.37%-8.34%-57.76%
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
57.30%40.04%3.58%24.07%73.87%1.41%-20.52%118.96%11.32%-9.26%

Correlation

The correlation between NC and DHT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2005

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NC:

$390.51M

DHT:

$2.91B

EPS

NC:

$2.87

DHT:

$2.06

PE Ratio

NC:

17.99

DHT:

8.78

PEG Ratio

NC:

0.43

DHT:

0.29

PS Ratio

NC:

1.41

DHT:

5.14

PB Ratio

NC:

0.89

DHT:

2.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

NC:

$274.40M

DHT:

$566.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NC:

$42.94M

DHT:

$268.69M

EBITDA (TTM)

NC:

-$5.34M

DHT:

$450.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NC vs. DHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NC
NC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

DHT
DHT Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NC vs. DHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NACCO Industries, Inc. (NC) and DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NCDHTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.34

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

5.04

-3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.76

11.49

-8.73

NC vs. DHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NC Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the DHT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NC and DHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NC vs. DHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NC drawdown since its inception was -91.50%, smaller than the maximum DHT drawdown of -97.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NC and DHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NCDHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.50%

-97.12%

+5.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.61%

-15.22%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.24%

-24.96%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.01%

-34.44%

-20.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.21%

-39.56%

-40.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.08%

-63.69%

+29.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.54%

-76.34%

+39.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.79%

6.68%

+4.11%

Volatility

NC vs. DHT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NACCO Industries, Inc. (NC) is 7.17%, while DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) has a volatility of 14.14%. This indicates that NC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NCDHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

14.14%

-6.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.76%

29.36%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.28%

35.13%

+7.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.76%

38.61%

+8.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.34%

41.69%

+8.65%

Dividends

NC vs. DHT - Dividend Comparison

NC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than DHT's 8.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
8.13%6.06%10.76%11.72%1.35%2.50%25.81%2.42%2.04%5.57%17.15%6.55%
NC
NACCO Industries, Inc.
1.97%2.01%3.02%2.36%2.16%2.16%2.92%1.57%1.95%2.60%1.18%2.48%

Financials

NC vs. DHT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NACCO Industries, Inc. and DHT Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
62.78M
186.48M
(NC) Total Revenue
(DHT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NC vs. DHT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NACCO Industries, Inc. and DHT Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
22.8%
60.4%
Portfolio components
NC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NACCO Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.29M and revenue of 62.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.

DHT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 112.62M and revenue of 186.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.

NC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NACCO Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.57M and revenue of 62.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.4%.

DHT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 107.66M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.7%.

NC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NACCO Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 8.84M and revenue of 62.78M, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.

DHT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 164.53M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in a net margin of 88.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NC and DHT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHT has higher volatility (14.14%) compared to NC (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NC dropped -91.50% vs DHT's -97.12%.

DHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NC and DHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer