NBR vs. ECG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

NBR (Nabors Industries Ltd.) and ECG (Everus Construction Group Inc) are both stocks. NBR operates in Oil & Gas Drilling (Energy), while ECG operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past year, NBR returned 247.24% vs 161.83% for ECG. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NBR vs. ECG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) and Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NBR having a 73.81% return and ECG slightly higher at 76.20%.

NBR

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: -6.53%
• YTD: 73.81%
• 6M: 88.46%
• 1Y: 247.24%
• 3Y*: -0.70%
• 5Y*: -4.38%
• 10Y*: -13.43%

ECG

• 1D: 3.88%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 76.20%
• 6M: 64.96%
• 1Y: 161.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBR vs. ECG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NBR Nabors Industries Ltd.	73.81%	-5.02%	-21.55%
ECG Everus Construction Group Inc	76.20%	30.13%	34.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NBR and ECG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024	0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap NBR : $1.34B ECG : $7.72B
EPS NBR : $15.33 ECG : $4.37
PE Ratio NBR : 6.16 ECG : 34.51
PEG Ratio NBR : 0.28 ECG : 2.02
PS Ratio NBR : 0.41 ECG : 1.95
Total Revenue (TTM) NBR : $3.23B ECG : $3.96B
Gross Profit (TTM) NBR : $661.90M ECG : $492.32M
EBITDA (TTM) NBR : $1.31B ECG : $334.68M

Return for Risk

NBR vs. ECG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBR

NBR Risk / Return Rank: 96
NBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
NBR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
NBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
NBR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

ECG

ECG Risk / Return Rank: 93
ECG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ECG Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ECG Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ECG Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ECG Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBR vs. ECG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) and Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBR	ECG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.07	2.88	+1.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.93	3.37	+0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.44	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.43	7.91	+4.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	38.37	21.41	+16.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NBR vs. ECG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBR Sharpe Ratio is 4.07, which is higher than the ECG Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBR and ECG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBR	ECG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.07	2.88	+1.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	1.65	-1.67

Drawdowns

NBR vs. ECG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBR drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, which is greater than ECG's maximum drawdown of -56.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBR and ECG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBR	ECG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.51%	-56.23%	-43.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.38%	-20.26%	-1.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-82.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.45%	-10.88%	-84.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.73%	-14.03%	-38.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.92%	7.49%	-0.57%

Volatility

NBR vs. ECG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) is 12.99%, while Everus Construction Group Inc (ECG) has a volatility of 16.33%. This indicates that NBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBR	ECG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.99%	16.33%	-3.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.68%	45.49%	-8.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.30%	56.47%	+4.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.41%	62.99%	+3.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.10%	62.99%	+19.11%

Dividends

NBR vs. ECG - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBR nor ECG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ECG Everus Construction Group Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NBR Nabors Industries Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.86%	1.39%	12.00%	3.51%	1.46%	2.82%

Financials

NBR vs. ECG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Nabors Industries Ltd. and Everus Construction Group Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NBR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nabors Industries Ltd. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 786.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ECG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everus Construction Group Inc reported a gross profit of 130.73M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.

NBR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nabors Industries Ltd. reported an operating income of 48.63M and revenue of 786.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

ECG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everus Construction Group Inc reported an operating income of 77.68M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.

NBR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nabors Industries Ltd. reported a net income of -15.17M and revenue of 786.44M, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.

ECG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Everus Construction Group Inc reported a net income of 58.32M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBR and ECG in my portfolio?

NBR and ECG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBR or ECG?

ECG has higher volatility (16.33%) compared to NBR (12.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBR dropped -99.51% vs ECG's -56.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.07 vs 2.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.