NBR vs. PTN
NBR (Nabors Industries Ltd.) and PTN (Palatin Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. NBR operates in Oil & Gas Drilling (Energy), while PTN operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NBR vs. PTN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBR achieves a 73.81% return, which is significantly higher than PTN's -9.62% return.
NBR
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -6.53%
- YTD
- 73.81%
- 6M
- 88.46%
- 1Y
- 247.24%
- 3Y*
- -0.70%
- 5Y*
- -4.38%
- 10Y*
- -13.43%
PTN
- 1D
- -4.86%
- 1M
- -31.29%
- YTD
- -9.62%
- 6M
- -29.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NBR vs. PTN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NBR Nabors Industries Ltd. | 73.81% | 12.10% |
PTN Palatin Technologies, Inc. | -9.62% | 39.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBR and PTN is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
NBR:
$1.34B
PTN:
$54.38M
NBR:
$15.33
PTN:
-$2.39
NBR:
0.41
PTN:
4.06
NBR:
$3.23B
PTN:
$8.96M
NBR:
$661.90M
PTN:
$8.90M
NBR:
$1.31B
PTN:
-$6.39M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBR vs. PTN — Risk / Return Rank
NBR
PTN
NBR vs. PTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) and Palatin Technologies, Inc. (PTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NBR | PTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.07 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.93 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.43 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 38.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NBR | PTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.37 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
NBR vs. PTN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBR drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, which is greater than PTN's maximum drawdown of -50.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBR and PTN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBR | PTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.51% | -50.36% | -49.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.45% | -50.36% | -45.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.73% | -29.42% | -23.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.92% | — | — |
Volatility
NBR vs. PTN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBR | PTN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.30% | 142.44% | -81.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.41% | 142.44% | -76.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.10% | 142.44% | -60.34% |
Dividends
NBR vs. PTN - Dividend Comparison
Neither NBR nor PTN has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBR Nabors Industries Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.86% | 1.39% | 12.00% | 3.51% | 1.46% | 2.82% |
PTN Palatin Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
NBR vs. PTN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nabors Industries Ltd. and Palatin Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NBR and PTN have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NBR and PTN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer