NBR vs. PTN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) and Palatin Technologies, Inc. (PTN).

Performance

NBR vs. PTN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) and Palatin Technologies, Inc. (PTN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NBR vs. PTN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NBR Nabors Industries Ltd.	46.11%	12.10%
PTN Palatin Technologies, Inc.	11.83%	39.31%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NBR : $1.13B PTN : $43.68M
EPS NBR : $19.41 PTN : -$6.92
PS Ratio NBR : 0.35 PTN : 2.71
PB Ratio NBR : 1.18 PTN : 3.81
Total Revenue (TTM) NBR : $3.19B PTN : $8.85M
Gross Profit (TTM) NBR : $798.81M PTN : $8.79M
EBITDA (TTM) NBR : $1.32B PTN : -$9.56M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBR achieves a 46.11% return, which is significantly higher than PTN's 11.83% return.

NBR

• 1D: -7.81%
• 1M: 3.17%
• YTD: 46.11%
• 6M: 90.68%
• 1Y: 87.92%
• 3Y*: -13.34%
• 5Y*: -4.29%
• 10Y*: -14.73%

PTN

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -23.39%
• YTD: 11.83%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NBR vs. PTN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBR

NBR Risk / Return Rank: 75
NBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
NBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
NBR Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NBR Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBR vs. PTN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) and Palatin Technologies, Inc. (PTN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBR	PTN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.78	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBR	PTN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.03	1.39	-1.42

Correlation

The correlation between NBR and PTN is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NBR vs. PTN - Dividend Comparison

Neither NBR nor PTN has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NBR Nabors Industries Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.86%	1.39%	12.00%	3.51%	1.46%	2.82%
PTN Palatin Technologies, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NBR vs. PTN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBR drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, which is greater than PTN's maximum drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBR and PTN.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBR	PTN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.51%	-48.25%	-51.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.18%	-38.57%	-57.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.53%	-27.09%	-25.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NBR	PTN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.57%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.84%	162.40%	-88.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.88%	162.40%	-94.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.14%	162.40%	-80.26%

Financials