NBIS vs. DFND
NBIS (Nebius Group N.V.) is a stock, while DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Over the past year, NBIS returned 393.02% vs 1.72% for DFND. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NBIS vs. DFND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NBIS
- 1D
- 4.55%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 177.59%
- 6M
- 164.98%
- 1Y
- 393.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 1.72%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
NBIS vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 177.59% | 202.18% | 46.25% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | -2.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between NBIS and DFND is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NBIS vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank
NBIS
DFND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NBIS vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NBIS | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.05 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.03 | 0.60 | +7.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.34 | 1.08 | +17.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NBIS vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBIS drawdown since its inception was -58.27%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBIS and DFND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NBIS | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.27% | -22.65% | -35.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.47% | -3.44% | -42.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.15% | -3.69% | -8.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -5.70% | -13.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.86% | 3.72% | +16.14% |
Volatility
NBIS vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison
Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a higher volatility of 30.23% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that NBIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NBIS | DFND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.23% | 0.00% | +30.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 71.43% | 6.10% | +65.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 104.41% | 10.88% | +93.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.20% | 22.44% | +87.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.20% | 19.08% | +91.12% |
Dividends
NBIS vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison
Neither NBIS nor DFND has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
NBIS Nebius Group N.V. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NBIS and DFND have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NBIS has higher volatility (30.23%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBIS dropped -58.27% vs DFND's -22.65%.
NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NBIS and DFND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer