NBDS vs. BULD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NBDS (Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF) and BULD (Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. NBDS is actively managed, while BULD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NBDS returned 23.07%/yr vs 18.64%/yr for BULD. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NBDS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BULD.

Performance

NBDS vs. BULD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBDS achieves a 17.73% return, which is significantly lower than BULD's 34.29% return.

NBDS

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 16.39%
• YTD: 17.73%
• 6M: 15.50%
• 1Y: 33.80%
• 3Y*: 23.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BULD

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 14.07%
• YTD: 34.29%
• 6M: 30.65%
• 1Y: 64.78%
• 3Y*: 18.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NBDS vs. BULD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF	17.73%	19.58%	17.97%	38.55%	-9.72%
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF	34.29%	23.20%	-3.93%	28.27%	-12.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NBDS and BULD is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2022	0.80

The correlation between NBDS and BULD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NBDS vs. BULD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBDS

NBDS Risk / Return Rank: 34
NBDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
NBDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
NBDS Omega Ratio Rank: 38
NBDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
NBDS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

BULD

BULD Risk / Return Rank: 71
BULD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
BULD Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BULD Omega Ratio Rank: 61
BULD Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
BULD Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NBDS vs. BULD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NBDS	BULD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	2.34	-0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	3.17	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.37	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	4.21	-2.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.71	13.30	-9.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NBDS vs. BULD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBDS Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the BULD Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBDS and BULD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NBDS	BULD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	2.34	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.55	-0.04

Drawdowns

NBDS vs. BULD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBDS drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, which is greater than BULD's maximum drawdown of -27.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBDS and BULD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NBDS	BULD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.81%	-27.64%	-2.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.96%	-15.48%	-8.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.51%	-27.64%	-0.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-0.38%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.52%	-8.30%	-1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.13%	4.88%	+4.25%

Volatility

NBDS vs. BULD - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF (BULD) have volatilities of 8.88% and 8.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NBDS	BULD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.88%	8.50%	+0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.41%	21.34%	-1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.54%	27.85%	-3.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.64%	27.73%	-0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.64%	27.73%	-0.09%

NBDS vs. BULD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBDS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BULD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

NBDS vs. BULD - Dividend Comparison

NBDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than BULD's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BULD Pacer BlueStar Engineering the Future ETF	0.92%	1.24%	0.18%	0.21%	0.08%
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF	0.32%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NBDS and BULD in my portfolio?

NBDS and BULD have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NBDS or BULD?

NBDS has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to BULD (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBDS dropped -29.81% vs BULD's -27.64%.

Which ETF is better, NBDS or BULD?

On 3-year performance, NBDS leads with 23.07% vs 18.64% for BULD. On fees, NBDS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, BULD has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NBDS or BULD?

Over the 3-year period, NBDS has performed better with a 23.07% return vs 18.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NBDS or BULD?

NBDS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BULD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NBDS or BULD?

BULD has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.32% for NBDS.

What is the main difference between NBDS and BULD?

They also come from different issuers: Neuberger Berman and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for NBDS and 0.60% for BULD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BULD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.