PortfoliosLab logo
NBDS vs. IETC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NBDS and IETC is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

NBDS vs. IETC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NBDS:

0.25

IETC:

0.96

Sortino Ratio

NBDS:

0.46

IETC:

1.25

Omega Ratio

NBDS:

1.06

IETC:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

NBDS:

0.19

IETC:

0.88

Martin Ratio

NBDS:

0.58

IETC:

2.97

Ulcer Index

NBDS:

9.18%

IETC:

7.49%

Daily Std Dev

NBDS:

32.18%

IETC:

28.12%

Max Drawdown

NBDS:

-29.81%

IETC:

-38.48%

Current Drawdown

NBDS:

-5.96%

IETC:

-2.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBDS achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly higher than IETC's 2.41% return.


NBDS

YTD

4.04%

1M

11.20%

6M

0.13%

1Y

9.33%

3Y*

16.46%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IETC

YTD

2.41%

1M

9.67%

6M

6.23%

1Y

26.89%

3Y*

24.35%

5Y*

20.23%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF

NBDS vs. IETC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBDS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IETC's 0.18% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NBDS vs. IETC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBDS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NBDS is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NBDS is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NBDS is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NBDS is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NBDS is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NBDS is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

IETC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IETC is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IETC is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IETC is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IETC is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IETC is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IETC is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NBDS vs. IETC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NBDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the IETC Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBDS and IETC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NBDS vs. IETC - Dividend Comparison

NBDS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IETC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
NBDS
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IETC
iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF
0.49%0.52%0.79%0.92%0.73%0.48%0.79%1.27%

Drawdowns

NBDS vs. IETC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBDS drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, smaller than the maximum IETC drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBDS and IETC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NBDS vs. IETC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) is 6.00%, while iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that NBDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IETC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...