PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NBDS vs. QTUM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NBDS and QTUM is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

NBDS vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.75%
36.90%
NBDS
QTUM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NBDS:

0.82

QTUM:

1.88

Sortino Ratio

NBDS:

1.23

QTUM:

2.48

Omega Ratio

NBDS:

1.16

QTUM:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

NBDS:

1.23

QTUM:

2.98

Martin Ratio

NBDS:

4.33

QTUM:

8.65

Ulcer Index

NBDS:

4.45%

QTUM:

5.90%

Daily Std Dev

NBDS:

23.42%

QTUM:

27.11%

Max Drawdown

NBDS:

-29.81%

QTUM:

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

NBDS:

0.00%

QTUM:

-2.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBDS achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's 4.12% return.


NBDS

YTD

10.63%

1M

3.43%

6M

10.75%

1Y

17.00%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QTUM

YTD

4.12%

1M

3.19%

6M

36.90%

1Y

47.22%

5Y*

23.15%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NBDS vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBDS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.


NBDS
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
Expense ratio chart for NBDS: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%
Expense ratio chart for QTUM: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NBDS vs. QTUM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NBDS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NBDS is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NBDS is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NBDS is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NBDS is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NBDS is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NBDS is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QTUM is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QTUM is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QTUM is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QTUM is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QTUM is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QTUM is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NBDS vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NBDS, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.821.88
The chart of Sortino ratio for NBDS, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.232.48
The chart of Omega ratio for NBDS, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.161.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for NBDS, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.232.98
The chart of Martin ratio for NBDS, currently valued at 4.33, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.338.65
NBDS
QTUM

The current NBDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBDS and QTUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.82
1.88
NBDS
QTUM

Dividends

NBDS vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

NBDS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
NBDS
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.58%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.45%0.61%0.21%

Drawdowns

NBDS vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBDS drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBDS and QTUM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
-2.21%
NBDS
QTUM

Volatility

NBDS vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 6.39%. This indicates that NBDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
7.39%
6.39%
NBDS
QTUM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab