PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
NBDS vs. QTUM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NBDS and QTUM is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

NBDS vs. QTUM

Last updated May 30, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM).

NBDS and QTUM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NBDS is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Apr 6, 2022. QTUM is a passively managed fund by Defiance ETFs that tracks the performance of the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. It was launched on Sep 5, 2018.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NBDS or QTUM.

Performance

NBDS vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NBDS:

0.19

QTUM:

1.16

Sortino Ratio

NBDS:

0.44

QTUM:

1.66

Omega Ratio

NBDS:

1.06

QTUM:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

NBDS:

0.17

QTUM:

1.44

Martin Ratio

NBDS:

0.54

QTUM:

4.46

Ulcer Index

NBDS:

9.17%

QTUM:

8.21%

Daily Std Dev

NBDS:

32.19%

QTUM:

33.33%

Max Drawdown

NBDS:

-29.81%

QTUM:

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

NBDS:

-6.02%

QTUM:

-2.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBDS achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 5.53% return.

NBDS

YTD

3.97%

1M

12.63%

6M

1.26%

1Y

6.02%

3Y*

16.07%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QTUM

YTD

5.53%

1M

14.07%

6M

25.43%

1Y

38.35%

3Y*

23.50%

5Y*

25.41%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF

Defiance Quantum ETF

NBDS vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBDS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

NBDS
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NBDS vs. QTUM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NBDS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NBDS is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NBDS is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NBDS is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NBDS is 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NBDS is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NBDS is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
QTUM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QTUM is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QTUM is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QTUM is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QTUM is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QTUM is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QTUM is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NBDS vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NBDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBDS and QTUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NBDS vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

NBDS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.

TTM2024202320222021202020192018
NBDS
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF		0.64%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.45%0.61%0.21%

Drawdowns

NBDS vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBDS drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBDS and QTUM.

Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NBDS vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) is 5.98%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that NBDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...