NBDS vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
NBDS and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NBDS is an actively managed fund by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Apr 6, 2022. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NBDS or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between NBDS and SCHG is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
NBDS vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
NBDS:
-0.61
SCHG:
-0.08
NBDS:
-0.67
SCHG:
0.03
NBDS:
0.91
SCHG:
1.00
NBDS:
-0.60
SCHG:
-0.08
NBDS:
-2.47
SCHG:
-0.34
NBDS:
6.90%
SCHG:
5.22%
NBDS:
27.83%
SCHG:
21.27%
NBDS:
-29.81%
SCHG:
-34.59%
NBDS:
-28.29%
SCHG:
-22.36%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NBDS achieves a -20.67% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -18.93% return.
NBDS
-20.67%
-19.99%
-22.61%
-15.73%
N/A
N/A
SCHG
-18.93%
-15.76%
-13.06%
-0.40%
19.50%
13.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NBDS vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NBDS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NBDS vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
NBDS
SCHG
NBDS vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NBDS vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
NBDS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBDS Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
NBDS vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NBDS drawdown since its inception was -29.81%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBDS and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NBDS vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) has a higher volatility of 14.44% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 11.13%. This indicates that NBDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.