PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NB vs. METC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NB vs. METC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NB achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly higher than METC's -15.22% return.


NB

1D
-0.37%
1M
-9.24%
YTD
1.89%
6M
-12.62%
1Y
92.17%
3Y*
1.92%
5Y*
10Y*

METC

1D
2.62%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
-15.22%
6M
-2.18%
1Y
48.88%
3Y*
30.21%
5Y*
26.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NB vs. METC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NB
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock
1.89%241.94%-51.41%-57.47%
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
-15.22%94.40%-37.24%113.31%

Correlation

The correlation between NB and METC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2023

0.24

Over the past year, NB and METC have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

NB:

-$0.52

METC:

-$1.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

NB:

$0.00

METC:

$523.58M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NB:

-$1.00K

METC:

$10.83M

EBITDA (TTM)

NB:

-$54.65M

METC:

$723.00K

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NB vs. METC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NB
NB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NB Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NB Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

METC
METC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
METC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
METC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
METC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
METC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NB vs. METC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBMETCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.16

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

0.65

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.24

0.90

+1.34

NB vs. METC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NB Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the METC Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NB and METC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NB vs. METC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NB drawdown since its inception was -82.83%, roughly equal to the maximum METC drawdown of -86.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NB and METC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBMETCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.83%

-86.53%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.10%

-75.80%

+11.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.24%

-75.80%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.73%

-72.03%

+18.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.96%

-52.05%

-3.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.32%

54.60%

-13.28%

Volatility

NB vs. METC - Volatility Comparison

NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) has a higher volatility of 27.41% compared to Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) at 21.68%. This indicates that NB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBMETCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.41%

21.68%

+5.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.56%

61.83%

+4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.28%

102.03%

+7.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

91.82%

82.20%

+9.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.82%

75.87%

+15.95%

Dividends

NB vs. METC - Dividend Comparison

Neither NB nor METC has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
0.00%1.10%5.32%2.91%5.11%
NB
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NB vs. METC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock and Ramaco Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M202220232024202520260
121.61M
(NB) Total Revenue
(METC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NB and METC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NB has higher volatility (27.41%) compared to METC (21.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NB dropped -82.83% vs METC's -86.53%.

NB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NB and METC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer