NB vs. CMP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) and Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP).

Performance

NB vs. CMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) and Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NB vs. CMP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NB NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock	-15.85%	241.94%	-51.41%	-57.86%
CMP Compass Minerals International, Inc.	18.89%	74.58%	-55.26%	-21.55%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NB : $521.03M CMP : $986.93M
EPS NB : -$0.69 CMP : -$0.89
PB Ratio NB : 1.69 CMP : 3.79
Total Revenue (TTM) NB : $0.00 CMP : $1.33B
Gross Profit (TTM) NB : -$1.00K CMP : $219.60M
EBITDA (TTM) NB : -$58.87M CMP : $149.10M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NB achieves a -15.85% return, which is significantly lower than CMP's 18.89% return.

NB

• 1D: 6.44%
• 1M: -15.85%
• YTD: -15.85%
• 6M: -33.23%
• 1Y: 126.40%
• 3Y*: -11.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CMP

• 1D: 2.73%
• 1M: -7.34%
• YTD: 18.89%
• 6M: 21.61%
• 1Y: 151.35%
• 3Y*: -11.36%
• 5Y*: -17.22%
• 10Y*: -7.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NB vs. CMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NB

NB Risk / Return Rank: 75
NB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
NB Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
NB Omega Ratio Rank: 75
NB Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
NB Martin Ratio Rank: 68

CMP

CMP Risk / Return Rank: 93
CMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CMP Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CMP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NB vs. CMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) and Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NB	CMP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	2.82	-1.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	3.25	-1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.44	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	5.49	-3.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.09	11.82	-8.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NB vs. CMP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NB Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the CMP Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NB and CMP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NB	CMP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	2.82	-1.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.18	0.14	-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between NB and CMP is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NB vs. CMP - Dividend Comparison

Neither NB nor CMP has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NB NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CMP Compass Minerals International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%	2.37%	1.46%	4.52%	4.67%	4.72%	6.91%	3.99%	3.55%	3.51%

Drawdowns

NB vs. CMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NB drawdown since its inception was -82.83%, smaller than the maximum CMP drawdown of -89.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NB and CMP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NB	CMP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.83%	-89.12%	+6.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.10%	-26.29%	-37.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-89.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.78%	-67.30%	+5.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.29%	-24.49%	-31.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.31%	12.21%	+25.10%

Volatility

NB vs. CMP - Volatility Comparison

NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) has a higher volatility of 19.72% compared to Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP) at 13.18%. This indicates that NB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NB	CMP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.72%	13.18%	+6.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	78.03%	39.72%	+38.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	115.82%	54.05%	+61.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.94%	51.80%	+40.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.94%	44.46%	+47.48%

Financials