NB vs. LYSDY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY).

Performance

NB vs. LYSDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NB vs. LYSDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NB NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock	-14.34%	241.94%	-51.41%	-57.86%
LYSDY Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR	64.93%	109.37%	-18.22%	12.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NB : $530.37M LYSDY : $13.41B
EPS NB : -$0.69 LYSDY : $0.14
PB Ratio NB : 1.72 LYSDY : 3.99
Total Revenue (TTM) NB : $0.00 LYSDY : $1.19B
Gross Profit (TTM) NB : -$1.00K LYSDY : $301.27M
EBITDA (TTM) NB : -$58.87M LYSDY : $236.57M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NB achieves a -14.34% return, which is significantly lower than LYSDY's 64.93% return.

NB

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: -18.93%
• YTD: -14.34%
• 6M: -31.00%
• 1Y: 122.55%
• 3Y*: -10.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LYSDY

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: 64.93%
• 6M: 20.39%
• 1Y: 204.46%
• 3Y*: 47.62%
• 5Y*: 23.78%
• 10Y*: 74.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NB vs. LYSDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NB

NB Risk / Return Rank: 74
NB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
NB Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
NB Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NB Martin Ratio Rank: 69

LYSDY

LYSDY Risk / Return Rank: 92
LYSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LYSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
LYSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LYSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
LYSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NB vs. LYSDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NB	LYSDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	3.09	-2.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	3.13	-1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.39	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	4.53	-2.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.48	9.61	-6.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NB vs. LYSDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NB Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the LYSDY Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NB and LYSDY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NB	LYSDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	3.09	-2.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.17	0.03	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between NB and LYSDY is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NB vs. LYSDY - Dividend Comparison

Neither NB nor LYSDY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NB vs. LYSDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NB drawdown since its inception was -82.83%, smaller than the maximum LYSDY drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NB and LYSDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	NB	LYSDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.83%	-99.93%	+17.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.10%	-46.39%	-17.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-58.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.10%	-50.67%	-10.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-56.29%	-84.92%	+28.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.51%	21.86%	+15.65%

Volatility

NB vs. LYSDY - Volatility Comparison

NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) have volatilities of 18.66% and 18.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NB	LYSDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.66%	18.70%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	78.05%	53.18%	+24.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	115.70%	66.71%	+48.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.88%	50.34%	+41.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.88%	279.44%	-187.56%

Financials