NASA vs. WARP
NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) and WARP (VanEck Space ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NASA is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by Tema, while WARP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Space Index. NASA is actively managed, while WARP is passively managed. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. NASA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WARP.
Performance
NASA vs. WARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NASA
- 1D
- -6.38%
- 1M
- -29.63%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
WARP
- 1D
- -4.96%
- 1M
- -27.70%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $33.88M | $51.02M | $221.45M | |
WARP VanEck Space ETF | $857.04K | $1.11M | $3.85M |
NASA vs. WARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | -32.50% |
WARP VanEck Space ETF | -31.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASA and WARP is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASA vs. WARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and VanEck Space ETF (WARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NASA vs. WARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASA drawdown since its inception was -50.97%, roughly equal to the maximum WARP drawdown of -53.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASA and WARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASA | WARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.97% | -53.52% | +2.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.97% | -53.52% | +2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.13% | -26.90% | +9.77% |
Volatility
NASA vs. WARP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASA | WARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.77% | 77.17% | -11.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.77% | 77.17% | -11.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.77% | 77.17% | -11.40% |
NASA vs. WARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WARP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NASA vs. WARP - Dividend Comparison
Neither NASA nor WARP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, NASA and WARP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WARP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WARP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NASA.
NASA and WARP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
NASA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while WARP is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tema and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NASA and 0.50% for WARP.
Find the right allocation for NASA and WARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer