NASA vs. WARP
NASA (Tema Space Innovators ETF) and WARP (VanEck Space ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NASA is a Aerospace & Defense fund actively managed by Tema, while WARP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Space Index. NASA is actively managed, while WARP is passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NASA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for WARP.
Performance
NASA vs. WARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NASA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -15.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WARP
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -17.83%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NASA vs. WARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NASA Tema Space Innovators ETF | -12.29% |
WARP VanEck Space ETF | -13.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between NASA and WARP is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NASA vs. WARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and VanEck Space ETF (WARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NASA vs. WARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NASA drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, smaller than the maximum WARP drawdown of -43.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASA and WARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NASA | WARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.93% | -43.22% | +6.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.29% | -41.03% | +4.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -19.90% | +8.27% |
Volatility
NASA vs. WARP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NASA | WARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.67% | 84.96% | -17.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.67% | 84.96% | -17.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.67% | 84.96% | -17.29% |
NASA vs. WARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
NASA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WARP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NASA vs. WARP - Dividend Comparison
Neither NASA nor WARP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, NASA and WARP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WARP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WARP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NASA.
NASA and WARP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
NASA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while WARP is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tema and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NASA and 0.50% for WARP.
Find the right allocation for NASA and WARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer