PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NASA vs. WARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NASA vs. WARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and VanEck Space ETF (WARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NASA

1D
-6.38%
1M
-29.63%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

WARP

1D
-4.96%
1M
-27.70%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.88M$51.02M$221.45M
$857.04K$1.11M$3.85M

NASA vs. WARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
NASA
Tema Space Innovators ETF
-32.50%
WARP
VanEck Space ETF
-31.48%

Correlation

The correlation between NASA and WARP is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NASA vs. WARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Space Innovators ETF (NASA) and VanEck Space ETF (WARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NASA vs. WARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NASA vs. WARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NASA drawdown since its inception was -50.97%, roughly equal to the maximum WARP drawdown of -53.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NASA and WARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NASAWARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.97%

-53.52%

+2.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.97%

-53.52%

+2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.13%

-26.90%

+9.77%

Volatility

NASA vs. WARP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NASAWARPDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.77%

77.17%

-11.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.77%

77.17%

-11.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.77%

77.17%

-11.40%

NASA vs. WARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NASA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than WARP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NASA vs. WARP - Dividend Comparison

Neither NASA nor WARP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, NASA and WARP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, WARP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WARP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NASA.

NASA and WARP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NASA is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while WARP is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tema and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NASA and 0.50% for WARP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NASA and WARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer