NAMS vs. FLTR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NAMS (NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V.) is a stock, while FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Over the past 3 years, NAMS returned 32.59%/yr vs 6.10%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NAMS vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NAMS) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAMS achieves a -8.47% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 1.91% return.

NAMS

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 7.54%
• YTD: -8.47%
• 6M: -9.60%
• 1Y: 71.80%
• 3Y*: 32.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLTR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.91%
• 6M: 2.40%
• 1Y: 5.30%
• 3Y*: 6.10%
• 5Y*: 4.49%
• 10Y*: 3.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NAMS vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NAMS NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V.	-8.47%	36.50%	130.08%	2.48%	5.31%
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	1.91%	5.22%	7.38%	7.41%	0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between NAMS and FLTR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2022	0.08

The correlation between NAMS and FLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NAMS vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NAMS

NAMS Risk / Return Rank: 74
NAMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
NAMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
NAMS Omega Ratio Rank: 70
NAMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NAMS Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NAMS vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NAMS) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NAMS	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	6.77	-5.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	12.78	-10.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	3.15	-1.92
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	16.96	-14.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.74	101.23	-96.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NAMS vs. FLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the FLTR Sharpe Ratio of 6.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAMS and FLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NAMS	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	6.77	-5.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	2.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.53	+0.01

Drawdowns

NAMS vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAMS drawdown since its inception was -66.23%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMS and FLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NAMS	FLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.23%	-17.84%	-48.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.41%	-0.31%	-31.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.82%	-1.93%	-54.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-3.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.53%	-0.04%	-22.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.02%	-0.67%	-21.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.20%	0.05%	+15.15%

Volatility

NAMS vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison

NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NAMS) has a higher volatility of 21.12% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.25%. This indicates that NAMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NAMS	FLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.12%	0.25%	+20.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.00%	0.62%	+38.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.79%	0.79%	+57.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.45%	2.13%	+69.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.45%	5.00%	+66.45%

Dividends

NAMS vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

NAMS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF	4.73%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%
NAMS NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NAMS and FLTR in my portfolio?

NAMS and FLTR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NAMS or FLTR?

NAMS has higher volatility (21.12%) compared to FLTR (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMS dropped -66.23% vs FLTR's -17.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.77 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.