NAMS vs. FLTR
NAMS (NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V.) is a stock, while FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Over the past 3 years, NAMS returned 34.98%/yr vs 5.95%/yr for FLTR. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NAMS vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NAMS achieves a -20.78% return, which is significantly lower than FLTR's 2.70% return.
NAMS
- 1D
- -2.35%
- 1M
- -20.21%
- 6M
- -10.70%
- YTD
- -20.78%
- 1Y
- 30.59%
- 3Y*
- 34.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 28.59%
FLTR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 1Y
- 5.01%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.76M | $33.35M | $28.52M | |
| $31.87M | $30.03M | $43.19M |
NAMS vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAMS NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. | -20.78% | 36.50% | 130.08% | 2.48% | -0.91% |
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 2.70% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between NAMS and FLTR is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NAMS vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
NAMS
FLTR
NAMS vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NAMS) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NAMS | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -10.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 2.96 | -1.84 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 16.15 | -15.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.57 | 95.31 | -93.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NAMS vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NAMS drawdown since its inception was -66.23%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMS and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NAMS | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.23% | -17.84% | -48.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.96% | -0.31% | -32.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.08% | -1.93% | -44.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -3.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.96% | 0.00% | -32.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.14% | -0.67% | -21.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.54% | 0.05% | +17.49% |
Volatility
NAMS vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NAMS) has a higher volatility of 17.78% compared to VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.17%. This indicates that NAMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NAMS | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.78% | 0.17% | +17.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.50% | 0.65% | +39.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.94% | 0.80% | +57.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.81% | 2.13% | +68.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.81% | 5.00% | +65.81% |
Dividends
NAMS vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
NAMS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | 4.21% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
NAMS NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NAMS and FLTR have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NAMS has higher volatility (17.78%) compared to FLTR (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMS dropped -66.23% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.40 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NAMS and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer