PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NAMS vs. VKTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NAMS vs. VKTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NAMS) and Viking Therapeutics, Inc. (VKTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NAMS achieves a -20.78% return, which is significantly lower than VKTX's -9.78% return.


NAMS

1D
-2.35%
1M
-20.21%
6M
-10.70%
YTD
-20.78%
1Y
30.59%
3Y*
34.98%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
28.59%

VKTX

1D
-4.14%
1M
-15.22%
6M
9.30%
YTD
-9.78%
1Y
-2.88%
3Y*
30.87%
5Y*
38.85%
10Y*
36.63%
ALL TIME*
12.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$31.87M$30.03M$43.19M
$78.34M$82.45M$79.18M

NAMS vs. VKTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NAMS
NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V.
-20.78%36.50%130.08%2.48%-0.91%
VKTX
Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
-9.78%-12.57%116.23%97.98%131.53%

Correlation

The correlation between NAMS and VKTX is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022

0.25

Over the past year, NAMS and VKTX have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.25, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NAMS:

$3.25B

VKTX:

$3.70B

EPS

NAMS:

-$2.11

VKTX:

-$4.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

NAMS:

$22.57M

VKTX:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

NAMS:

$19.47M

VKTX:

-$208.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

NAMS:

-$173.45M

VKTX:

-$539.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NAMS vs. VKTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NAMS
NAMS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NAMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NAMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
NAMS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NAMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
NAMS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VKTX
VKTX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VKTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VKTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VKTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VKTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
VKTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NAMS vs. VKTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NAMS) and Viking Therapeutics, Inc. (VKTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NAMSVKTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.08

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

-0.06

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.57

-0.11

+1.68

NAMS vs. VKTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NAMS Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the VKTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NAMS and VKTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NAMS vs. VKTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NAMS drawdown since its inception was -66.23%, smaller than the maximum VKTX drawdown of -90.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NAMS and VKTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NAMSVKTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.23%

-90.41%

+24.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.96%

-45.14%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.08%

-78.86%

+32.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.96%

-66.41%

+33.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.14%

-60.03%

+37.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.54%

23.55%

-6.01%

Volatility

NAMS vs. VKTX - Volatility Comparison

NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NAMS) has a higher volatility of 17.78% compared to Viking Therapeutics, Inc. (VKTX) at 16.06%. This indicates that NAMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VKTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NAMSVKTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.78%

16.06%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.50%

41.26%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.94%

74.46%

-16.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.81%

101.84%

-31.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.81%

97.12%

-26.31%

Dividends

NAMS vs. VKTX - Dividend Comparison

Neither NAMS nor VKTX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NAMS vs. VKTX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NAMS and VKTX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NAMS has higher volatility (17.78%) compared to VKTX (16.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NAMS dropped -66.23% vs VKTX's -90.41%.

NAMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NAMS and VKTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer