NADQ.DE vs. MWOT.DE
NADQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist) and MWOT.DE (Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - NADQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while MWOT.DE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NADQ.DE returned 37.21% vs 22.31% for MWOT.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NADQ.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for MWOT.DE.
Performance
NADQ.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NADQ.DE is traded in EUR, while MWOT.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MWOT.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NADQ.DE achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than MWOT.DE's 7.30% return.
NADQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 18.75%
- 1Y
- 37.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
MWOT.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 7.30%
- 6M
- 6.37%
- 1Y
- 22.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NADQ.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 20.63% | 7.04% | 8.24% |
MWOT.DE Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc | 7.30% | 4.57% | 11.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between NADQ.DE and MWOT.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2024 | 0.89 |
The correlation between NADQ.DE and MWOT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NADQ.DE vs. MWOT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NADQ.DE
MWOT.DE
NADQ.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc (MWOT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NADQ.DE | MWOT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.25 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 1.56 | +2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 4.36 | +6.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NADQ.DE | MWOT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 1.39 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.61 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
NADQ.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NADQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.44%, which is greater than MWOT.DE's maximum drawdown of -27.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADQ.DE and MWOT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NADQ.DE | MWOT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.44% | -27.04% | -6.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -14.59% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -1.45% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -6.52% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 5.22% | -1.87% |
Volatility
NADQ.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc (MWOT.DE) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NADQ.DE | MWOT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 4.15% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 11.32% | -0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 16.38% | -0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 20.73% | -0.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 20.73% | -1.19% |
NADQ.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NADQ.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOT.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NADQ.DE vs. MWOT.DE - Dividend Comparison
NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while MWOT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MWOT.DE Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.55% | 0.40% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, NADQ.DE and MWOT.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MWOT.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MWOT.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for NADQ.DE.
NADQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MWOT.DE is Large Cap Growth Equities. NADQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while MWOT.DE tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for NADQ.DE and 0.19% for MWOT.DE.
Find the right allocation for NADQ.DE and MWOT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer