PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MWOT.DE vs. ANAU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MWOT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc (MWOT.DE) and AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MWOT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MWOT.DE
Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc
-9.54%18.02%7.47%
ANAU.DE
AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc
-5.44%20.55%4.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWOT.DE achieves a -9.54% return, which is significantly lower than ANAU.DE's -5.44% return.


MWOT.DE

1D
2.98%
1M
-3.97%
YTD
-9.54%
6M
-7.85%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ANAU.DE

1D
3.30%
1M
-2.96%
YTD
-5.44%
6M
-2.17%
1Y
25.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MWOT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWOT.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than ANAU.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

MWOT.DE vs. ANAU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWOT.DE
MWOT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MWOT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MWOT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MWOT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
MWOT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MWOT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ANAU.DE
ANAU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ANAU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWOT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc (MWOT.DE) and AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MWOT.DEANAU.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

1.26

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

1.86

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.25

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

2.21

-1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.08

7.93

-3.86

MWOT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MWOT.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the ANAU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MWOT.DE and ANAU.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MWOT.DEANAU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

1.26

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

1.11

-0.70

Correlation

The correlation between MWOT.DE and ANAU.DE is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MWOT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MWOT.DE nor ANAU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MWOT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWOT.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, roughly equal to the maximum ANAU.DE drawdown of -22.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOT.DE and ANAU.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MWOT.DEANAU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.24%

-22.35%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.44%

-11.93%

-3.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.01%

-7.48%

-4.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-3.07%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.52%

3.03%

+1.49%

Volatility

MWOT.DE vs. ANAU.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc (MWOT.DE) and AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) have volatilities of 5.95% and 6.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MWOT.DEANAU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

6.08%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

12.07%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.00%

19.91%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.97%

18.40%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.97%

18.40%

+1.57%