NADQ.DE vs. ACWI
NADQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NADQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE returned 21.45%/yr vs 12.57%/yr for ACWI. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NADQ.DE charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NADQ.DE is traded in EUR, while ACWI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NADQ.DE achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 13.75% return. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE has outperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 21.45%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively lower 12.57% annualized return.
NADQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.24%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 19.44%
- 1Y
- 38.00%
- 3Y*
- 24.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.45%
ACWI
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 5.15%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.38%
- 1Y
- 27.07%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- 12.57%
NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 20.63% | 7.04% | 34.07% | 51.46% | -29.91% | 39.75% | 34.72% | 43.03% | 3.29% | 15.73% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 13.75% | 7.89% | 25.20% | 18.61% | -13.33% | 27.54% | 6.75% | 29.45% | -4.92% | 9.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between NADQ.DE and ACWI is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2008 | 0.54 |
The correlation between NADQ.DE and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NADQ.DE vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
NADQ.DE
ACWI
NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NADQ.DE | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.41 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 3.82 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 15.98 | -4.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NADQ.DE | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.40 | 2.21 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.82 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | 0.74 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.55 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NADQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.44%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADQ.DE and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NADQ.DE | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.44% | -45.79% | +12.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -7.11% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.70% | -20.51% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.16% | -20.51% | -10.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.16% | -32.80% | +1.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.86% | -0.39% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.93% | -6.43% | +0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 1.70% | +1.65% |
Volatility
NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.03%. This indicates that NADQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NADQ.DE | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 3.03% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 9.28% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.74% | 12.29% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.84% | 15.11% | +4.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 16.96% | +2.58% |
NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NADQ.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than ACWI's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.55% | 0.40% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NADQ.DE and ACWI have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NADQ.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NADQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
NADQ.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ACWI is Global Equities. NADQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for NADQ.DE and 0.32% for ACWI.
Find the right allocation for NADQ.DE and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer