PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NADQ.DE vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

NADQ.DE vs. ACWI

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI).

NADQ.DE and ACWI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NADQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Sep 10, 2020. ACWI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2008. Both NADQ.DE and ACWI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NADQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist		-4.20%7.04%34.07%51.46%-29.91%39.75%34.72%43.03%3.29%15.73%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF		0.33%7.89%25.20%18.61%-13.33%27.54%6.75%29.45%-4.92%9.05%
Different Trading Currencies

NADQ.DE is traded in EUR, while ACWI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NADQ.DE achieves a -4.20% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE has outperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 18.75%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively lower 11.56% annualized return.

NADQ.DE

1D
2.57%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
-4.20%
6M
-1.98%
1Y
15.93%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*
18.75%

ACWI

1D
0.29%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
0.33%
6M
2.61%
1Y
13.33%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist

iShares MSCI ACWI ETF

Often compared with NADQ.DE:
NADQ.DE vs. SXRV.DENADQ.DE vs. IWMNADQ.DE vs. SMHNADQ.DE vs. EQQQ.LNADQ.DE vs. QQQNADQ.DE vs. HMWD.LNADQ.DE vs. EXI2.DE
Often compared with ACWI:
ACWI vs. VTACWI vs. SPYACWI vs. VWRL.LACWI vs. ACWXACWI vs. ACWI.LACWI vs. VOOACWI vs. VTI

NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NADQ.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
NADQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

NADQ.DE vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NADQ.DE
NADQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NADQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NADQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NADQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NADQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
NADQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

NADQ.DEACWIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

0.70

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

1.07

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.17

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.06

+0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.71

4.53

+0.18

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NADQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NADQ.DE and ACWI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

NADQ.DEACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.70

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.67

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.68

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.52

+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between NADQ.DE and ACWI is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than ACWI's 1.58% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NADQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist		0.42%0.40%0.55%0.40%0.79%0.51%0.40%0.54%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF		1.58%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%

Drawdowns

NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NADQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.44%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -45.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADQ.DE and ACWI.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

NADQ.DEACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.44%

-56.00%

+22.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.97%

-9.73%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.16%

-26.42%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.16%

-33.53%

+2.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.52%

-6.20%

-1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-8.68%

+2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

2.60%

+0.78%

Volatility

NADQ.DE vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) have volatilities of 5.07% and 5.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

NADQ.DEACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

5.17%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

9.90%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.67%

19.08%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

15.04%

+4.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

16.99%

+2.57%