MWOT.DE vs. XNDX.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc (MWOT.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE).

MWOT.DE and XNDX.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MWOT.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2024. XNDX.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index. It was launched on Jul 9, 2025. Both MWOT.DE and XNDX.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

MWOT.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc (MWOT.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MWOT.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MWOT.DE Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc	-9.54%	11.54%
XNDX.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD	-5.51%	-4.19%

Different Trading Currencies

MWOT.DE is traded in USD, while XNDX.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XNDX.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MWOT.DE achieves a -9.54% return, which is significantly lower than XNDX.DE's -5.47% return.

MWOT.DE

• 1D: 2.98%
• 1M: -3.97%
• YTD: -9.54%
• 6M: -7.85%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XNDX.DE

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: -3.25%
• YTD: -5.47%
• 6M: -2.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWOT.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWOT.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XNDX.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

MWOT.DE

Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc

XNDX.DE

Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD

Return for Risk

MWOT.DE vs. XNDX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MWOT.DE

MWOT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 44
MWOT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
MWOT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
MWOT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 46
MWOT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
MWOT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWOT.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc (MWOT.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MWOT.DE	XNDX.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.08	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MWOT.DE	XNDX.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	-0.37	+0.78

Correlation

The correlation between MWOT.DE and XNDX.DE is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MWOT.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Dividend Comparison

MWOT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XNDX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

	TTM
MWOT.DE Amundi Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%
XNDX.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD	0.12%

Drawdowns

MWOT.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MWOT.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.24%, which is greater than XNDX.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MWOT.DE and XNDX.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	MWOT.DE	XNDX.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.24%	-20.11%	-3.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.01%	-17.95%	+5.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.41%	-11.71%	+7.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.52%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MWOT.DE	XNDX.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.95%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.90%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.00%	34.68%	-14.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.97%	34.68%	-14.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.97%	34.68%	-14.71%