NADQ.DE vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
NADQ.DE and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NADQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Sep 10, 2020. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both NADQ.DE and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NADQ.DE or IWM.
Key characteristics
| NADQ.DE | IWM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.71% | 8.61% |
| 1Y Return | 21.78% | 18.47% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.76% | 0.87% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 20.18% | 8.04% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 19.51% | 8.04% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.51 | 0.94 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.45% | 21.47% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.44% | -59.05% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.12% | -7.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between NADQ.DE and IWM is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
NADQ.DE vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, NADQ.DE achieves a 15.71% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 8.61% return. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 19.51%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.04% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NADQ.DE vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
NADQ.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NADQ.DE vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NADQ.DE vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
NADQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NADQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.40% | 0.54% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.26% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
NADQ.DE vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NADQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.44%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADQ.DE and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NADQ.DE vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) is 5.93%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that NADQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.