PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
NADQ.DE vs. EXI2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

NADQ.DE vs. EXI2.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI2.DE).

NADQ.DE and EXI2.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. NADQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Sep 10, 2020. EXI2.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones Global Titans 50. It was launched on Aug 14, 2001. Both NADQ.DE and EXI2.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

NADQ.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NADQ.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NADQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist		-4.20%7.04%34.07%51.46%-29.91%39.75%34.72%43.03%3.29%15.73%
EXI2.DE
iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE)		-3.59%10.38%38.84%33.44%-21.53%35.62%10.63%35.14%-0.86%6.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NADQ.DE achieves a -4.20% return, which is significantly lower than EXI2.DE's -3.59% return. Over the past 10 years, NADQ.DE has outperformed EXI2.DE with an annualized return of 18.75%, while EXI2.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 14.68% annualized return.

NADQ.DE

1D
2.57%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
-4.20%
6M
-1.98%
1Y
15.93%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*
18.75%

EXI2.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
-3.59%
6M
0.64%
1Y
18.67%
3Y*
20.76%
5Y*
14.01%
10Y*
14.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist

iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE)

Often compared with NADQ.DE:
NADQ.DE vs. SXRV.DENADQ.DE vs. IWMNADQ.DE vs. SMHNADQ.DE vs. EQQQ.LNADQ.DE vs. QQQNADQ.DE vs. ACWINADQ.DE vs. HMWD.L
Often compared with EXI2.DE:
EXI2.DE vs. SPYEXI2.DE vs. IS3Q.DEEXI2.DE vs. IS3R.DEEXI2.DE vs. QQQEXI2.DE vs. EQQU.LEXI2.DE vs. IOOEXI2.DE vs. XLG

NADQ.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NADQ.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than EXI2.DE's 0.51% expense ratio.

EXI2.DE
iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE)
NADQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist

Return for Risk

NADQ.DE vs. EXI2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
NADQ.DE
NADQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NADQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NADQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NADQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NADQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
NADQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
EXI2.DE
EXI2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EXI2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXI2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXI2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
EXI2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXI2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NADQ.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) and iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

NADQ.DEEXI2.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

1.02

-0.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

1.45

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

3.14

-1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.71

11.71

-6.99

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NADQ.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NADQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the EXI2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NADQ.DE and EXI2.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

NADQ.DEEXI2.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.02

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.84

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.88

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.37

+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between NADQ.DE and EXI2.DE is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

NADQ.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Dividend Comparison

NADQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, more than EXI2.DE's 0.39% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NADQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist		0.42%0.40%0.55%0.40%0.79%0.51%0.40%0.54%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EXI2.DE
iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE)		0.39%0.41%0.42%0.61%0.84%0.55%0.99%1.28%1.29%2.56%1.77%2.56%

Drawdowns

NADQ.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NADQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.44%, smaller than the maximum EXI2.DE drawdown of -59.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NADQ.DE and EXI2.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

NADQ.DEEXI2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.44%

-59.21%

+25.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.97%

-8.18%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.16%

-24.75%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.16%

-30.00%

-1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.52%

-5.59%

-1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.98%

-17.56%

+11.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

2.16%

+1.22%

Volatility

NADQ.DE vs. EXI2.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Dist (NADQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to iShares Dow Jones Global Titans 50 UCITS ETF (DE) (EXI2.DE) at 4.29%. This indicates that NADQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXI2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

NADQ.DEEXI2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

4.29%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

10.04%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.67%

18.17%

+2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.85%

16.56%

+3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

16.57%

+2.99%