MYMF vs. ITM
MYMF (State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF) and ITM (VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. MYMF is actively managed, while ITM is passively managed. Over the past year, MYMF returned 2.95% vs 7.29% for ITM. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MYMF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for ITM.
Performance
MYMF vs. ITM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MYMF achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than ITM's 0.61% return.
MYMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 2.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITM
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 7.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
MYMF vs. ITM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MYMF State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.58% | 3.01% | 0.19% |
ITM VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF | 0.61% | 5.34% | -0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYMF and ITM is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between MYMF and ITM shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYMF vs. ITM — Risk / Return Rank
MYMF
ITM
MYMF vs. ITM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) and VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MYMF | ITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.21 | 1.55 | +0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.79 | 2.13 | +5.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.74 | 6.84 | +21.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MYMF | ITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.98 | 2.58 | +1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | 0.44 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
MYMF vs. ITM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYMF drawdown since its inception was -2.02%, smaller than the maximum ITM drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYMF and ITM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYMF | ITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -24.75% | +22.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.38% | -3.43% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -1.33% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -2.98% | +2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | 1.07% | -0.97% |
Volatility
MYMF vs. ITM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) is 0.21%, while VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) has a volatility of 1.01%. This indicates that MYMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYMF | ITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.21% | 1.01% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.52% | 2.18% | -1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75% | 2.84% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.65% | 4.31% | -2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.65% | 7.10% | -5.45% |
MYMF vs. ITM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYMF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ITM's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MYMF vs. ITM - Dividend Comparison
MYMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than ITM's 2.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITM VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF | 2.93% | 2.86% | 2.73% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.70% | 2.13% | 2.44% | 2.33% | 2.21% | 2.29% | 2.28% |
MYMF State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.47% | 2.80% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYMF and ITM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ITM has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to MYMF (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYMF dropped -2.02% vs ITM's -24.75%.
On 1-year performance, ITM leads with 7.29% vs 2.95% for MYMF. On fees, MYMF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MYMF has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ITM has performed better with a 7.29% return vs 2.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MYMF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for ITM.
ITM has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 2.47% for MYMF.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MYMF and 0.24% for ITM.
MYMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MYMF and ITM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer