ITM vs. QTUM
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM).
ITM and QTUM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ITM is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg AMT-Free Intermediate Continuous. It was launched on Dec 4, 2007. QTUM is a passively managed fund by Defiance that tracks the performance of the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. It was launched on Sep 5, 2018. Both ITM and QTUM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ITM vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ITM vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITM VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF | -0.78% | 5.34% | 0.73% | 5.69% | -9.33% | 0.21% | 5.87% | 8.46% | 1.81% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | -0.14% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITM achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's -0.14% return.
ITM
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 5.00%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
QTUM
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- YTD
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 47.58%
- 3Y*
- 34.18%
- 5Y*
- 18.84%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ITM vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITM has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ITM vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
ITM
QTUM
ITM vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITM | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 1.61 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 2.24 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 3.16 | -1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 11.08 | -5.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITM | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.61 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.72 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.84 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between ITM and QTUM is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ITM vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
ITM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, more than QTUM's 1.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITM VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF | 2.95% | 2.86% | 2.73% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.70% | 2.13% | 2.44% | 2.33% | 2.21% | 2.29% | 2.28% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 1.07% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ITM vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITM drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITM and QTUM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITM | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.75% | -38.45% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.43% | -15.26% | +11.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.11% | -38.45% | +23.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -9.34% | +6.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -8.40% | +5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 4.36% | -3.34% |
Volatility
ITM vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) is 1.34%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 9.77%. This indicates that ITM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ITM | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 9.77% | -8.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.01% | 20.87% | -18.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21% | 29.70% | -25.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.28% | 26.21% | -21.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.09% | 27.05% | -19.96% |