PortfoliosLab logo
ITM vs. FTABX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ITM and FTABX is -0.14. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

ITM vs. FTABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ITM:

0.17

FTABX:

0.11

Sortino Ratio

ITM:

0.21

FTABX:

0.15

Omega Ratio

ITM:

1.03

FTABX:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

ITM:

0.09

FTABX:

0.08

Martin Ratio

ITM:

0.47

FTABX:

0.29

Ulcer Index

ITM:

1.47%

FTABX:

1.69%

Daily Std Dev

ITM:

4.96%

FTABX:

5.37%

Max Drawdown

ITM:

-24.75%

FTABX:

-15.78%

Current Drawdown

ITM:

-5.51%

FTABX:

-3.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITM achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly higher than FTABX's -1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, ITM has underperformed FTABX with an annualized return of 1.94%, while FTABX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.20% annualized return.


ITM

YTD

-1.08%

1M

2.05%

6M

-0.56%

1Y

0.85%

5Y*

0.45%

10Y*

1.94%

FTABX

YTD

-1.44%

1M

1.71%

6M

-1.48%

1Y

0.57%

5Y*

1.37%

10Y*

2.20%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ITM vs. FTABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITM has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FTABX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ITM vs. FTABX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ITM is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ITM is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ITM is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ITM is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ITM is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ITM is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FTABX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FTABX is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FTABX is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FTABX is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FTABX is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FTABX is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FTABX is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ITM vs. FTABX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ITM Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the FTABX Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITM and FTABX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ITM vs. FTABX - Dividend Comparison

ITM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than FTABX's 3.14% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
2.84%2.73%2.40%1.92%1.70%1.99%2.20%2.33%2.21%2.29%2.28%2.42%
FTABX
Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund
3.14%3.05%2.90%2.86%2.68%2.97%2.94%3.21%3.49%3.92%3.58%3.62%

Drawdowns

ITM vs. FTABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITM drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than FTABX's maximum drawdown of -15.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITM and FTABX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ITM vs. FTABX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) at 1.32%. This indicates that ITM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...