ITM vs. FTABX
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX).
ITM is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg AMT-Free Intermediate Continuous. It was launched on Dec 4, 2007. FTABX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 10, 2001.
Performance
ITM vs. FTABX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ITM vs. FTABX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITM VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF | -0.78% | 5.34% | 0.73% | 5.69% | -9.33% | 0.21% | 5.87% | 8.46% | 0.96% | 6.13% |
FTABX Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund | -0.50% | 5.60% | 1.54% | 7.51% | -10.74% | 2.20% | 4.80% | 8.58% | 0.67% | 6.45% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITM achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than FTABX's -0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ITM has underperformed FTABX with an annualized return of 1.95%, while FTABX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.32% annualized return.
ITM
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 5.00%
- 3Y*
- 2.85%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 1.95%
FTABX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 4.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 2.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ITM vs. FTABX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITM has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FTABX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ITM vs. FTABX — Risk / Return Rank
ITM
FTABX
ITM vs. FTABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITM | FTABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.97 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 1.31 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.15 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | 4.00 | +1.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITM | FTABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.97 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.24 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.54 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.04 | -0.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between ITM and FTABX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ITM vs. FTABX - Dividend Comparison
ITM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than FTABX's 3.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITM VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF | 2.95% | 2.86% | 2.73% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.70% | 2.13% | 2.44% | 2.33% | 2.21% | 2.29% | 2.28% |
FTABX Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund | 3.20% | 4.18% | 2.81% | 2.90% | 2.16% | 2.27% | 2.64% | 2.94% | 3.01% | 3.49% | 4.22% | 3.29% |
Drawdowns
ITM vs. FTABX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITM drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than FTABX's maximum drawdown of -16.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITM and FTABX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITM | FTABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.75% | -16.14% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.43% | -4.74% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.11% | -16.14% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.75% | -16.14% | -8.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -2.66% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -2.13% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 1.37% | -0.35% |
Volatility
ITM vs. FTABX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) at 1.15%. This indicates that ITM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ITM | FTABX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 1.15% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.01% | 1.79% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21% | 4.84% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.28% | 4.12% | +0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.09% | 4.27% | +2.82% |