PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITM vs. VTEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITM vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITM achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than VTEB's 1.46% return. Over the past 10 years, ITM has underperformed VTEB with an annualized return of 1.95%, while VTEB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.09% annualized return.


ITM

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.79%
YTD
0.61%
6M
1.22%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
0.44%
10Y*
1.95%

VTEB

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.89%
1Y
7.14%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
2.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITM vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
0.61%5.34%0.73%5.69%-9.33%0.21%5.87%8.46%0.96%6.13%
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
1.46%3.72%1.31%6.15%-7.99%1.14%5.19%7.35%1.04%4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ITM and VTEB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2015

0.79

The correlation between ITM and VTEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITM vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITM
ITM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ITM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ITM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITM Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VTEB
VTEB Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTEB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VTEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITM vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITMVTEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.58

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.65

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.84

9.41

-2.56

ITM vs. VTEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITM Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the VTEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITM and VTEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITMVTEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

2.64

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.23

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.40

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.47

-0.04

Drawdowns

ITM vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITM drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than VTEB's maximum drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITM and VTEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITMVTEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-17.00%

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-2.71%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.68%

-5.53%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.11%

-12.64%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

-17.00%

-7.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.52%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-2.33%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

0.76%

+0.31%

Volatility

ITM vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB) at 0.89%. This indicates that ITM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITMVTEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.89%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.18%

2.01%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84%

2.72%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.31%

3.90%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.10%

5.26%

+1.84%

ITM vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITM has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ITM vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison

ITM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than VTEB's 3.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
2.93%2.86%2.73%2.40%1.92%1.70%2.13%2.44%2.33%2.21%2.29%2.28%
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.35%3.29%3.14%2.79%2.09%1.64%1.99%2.30%2.25%1.96%1.66%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITM and VTEB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITM has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to VTEB (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITM dropped -24.75% vs VTEB's -17.00%.

On 10-year performance, VTEB leads with 2.09% vs 1.95% for ITM. On fees, VTEB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTEB has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTEB has performed better with a 2.09% return vs 1.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTEB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for ITM.

VTEB has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.93% for ITM.

ITM tracks Bloomberg AMT-Free Intermediate Continuous, while VTEB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for ITM and 0.03% for VTEB.

VTEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITM and VTEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer