MYMF vs. SMMU
MYMF (State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF) and SMMU (PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MYMF returned 2.93% vs 3.89% for SMMU. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MYMF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMMU.
Performance
MYMF vs. SMMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MYMF achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than SMMU's 1.03% return.
MYMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMMU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 3.64%
- 5Y*
- 1.89%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
MYMF vs. SMMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MYMF State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.58% | 3.01% | 0.19% |
SMMU PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF | 1.03% | 4.06% | -0.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYMF and SMMU is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024 | 0.44 |
The correlation between MYMF and SMMU shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYMF vs. SMMU — Risk / Return Rank
MYMF
SMMU
MYMF vs. SMMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) and PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MYMF | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.95 | 3.81 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.93 | 5.77 | +1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.19 | 1.90 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.61 | 5.04 | +2.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.15 | 18.06 | +10.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MYMF | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.95 | 3.81 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | 0.60 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
MYMF vs. SMMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYMF drawdown since its inception was -2.02%, smaller than the maximum SMMU drawdown of -5.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYMF and SMMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYMF | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -5.09% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.38% | -0.77% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -4.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.10% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -0.55% | +0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | 0.22% | -0.12% |
Volatility
MYMF vs. SMMU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMF) is 0.21%, while PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU) has a volatility of 0.31%. This indicates that MYMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYMF | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.21% | 0.31% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.52% | 0.80% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75% | 1.02% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.65% | 1.67% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.65% | 2.73% | -1.08% |
MYMF vs. SMMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYMF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMU's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MYMF vs. SMMU - Dividend Comparison
MYMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than SMMU's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYMF State Street My2026 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.47% | 2.80% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMMU PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF | 2.84% | 2.80% | 3.03% | 2.79% | 1.37% | 0.60% | 1.19% | 1.82% | 1.57% | 1.41% | 1.03% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYMF and SMMU have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMMU has higher volatility (0.31%) compared to MYMF (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MYMF dropped -2.02% vs SMMU's -5.09%.
On 1-year performance, SMMU leads with 3.89% vs 2.93% for MYMF. On fees, MYMF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MYMF has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMMU has performed better with a 3.89% return vs 2.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MYMF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMMU.
SMMU has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.47% for MYMF.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MYMF and 0.35% for SMMU.
MYMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.95 vs 3.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MYMF and SMMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer