PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITM vs. HYMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITM vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITM achieves a -1.18% return, which is significantly lower than HYMB's 2.11% return. Over the past 10 years, ITM has underperformed HYMB with an annualized return of 1.62%, while HYMB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.16% annualized return.


ITM

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.05%
6M
-1.76%
YTD
-1.18%
1Y
3.54%
3Y*
2.75%
5Y*
-0.07%
10Y*
1.62%
ALL TIME*
3.21%

HYMB

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.89%
6M
1.46%
YTD
2.11%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
4.39%
5Y*
0.00%
10Y*
2.16%
ALL TIME*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$51.30M$37.83M$29.23M
$16.58M$12.20M$10.73M

ITM vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
-1.18%5.34%0.73%5.69%-9.33%0.21%5.87%8.46%0.96%6.13%
HYMB
State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
2.11%2.04%5.52%7.73%-15.54%5.16%3.74%9.51%4.91%3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ITM and HYMB is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2011

0.54

Over the past year, ITM and HYMB have become more correlated (0.79) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITM vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ITM
ITM Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ITM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITM Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ITM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITM Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMB
HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ITM vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITMHYMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

2.32

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.24

9.52

-6.28

ITM vs. HYMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITM Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the HYMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITM and HYMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITM vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITM drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, smaller than the maximum HYMB drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITM and HYMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITMHYMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-29.57%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.43%

-3.11%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.67%

-6.66%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.99%

-20.10%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

-29.57%

+4.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-1.89%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.97%

-3.77%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

0.76%

+0.52%

Volatility

ITM vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) is 0.98%, while State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) has a volatility of 1.16%. This indicates that ITM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITMHYMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

1.16%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.35%

3.25%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97%

4.05%

-1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.32%

6.68%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.10%

11.36%

-4.26%

ITM vs. HYMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITM has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than HYMB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITM vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison

ITM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than HYMB's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYMB
State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.21%4.55%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
2.77%2.86%2.73%2.40%1.92%1.70%2.13%2.44%2.33%2.21%2.29%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITM and HYMB have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYMB has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to ITM (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITM dropped -24.75% vs HYMB's -29.57%.

On 10-year performance, HYMB leads with 2.16% vs 1.62% for ITM. On fees, ITM is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, ITM has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HYMB has performed better with a 2.16% return vs 1.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITM is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYMB.

HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 2.77% for ITM.

ITM tracks Bloomberg AMT-Free Intermediate Continuous, while HYMB tracks ICE US Select High Yield Crossover Municipal Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for ITM and 0.35% for HYMB.

HYMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITM and HYMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer