PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ITM vs. MUB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ITM and MUB is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

ITM vs. MUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-1.00%-0.50%0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.91%
0.49%
ITM
MUB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ITM:

0.56

MUB:

0.49

Sortino Ratio

ITM:

0.81

MUB:

0.70

Omega Ratio

ITM:

1.10

MUB:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

ITM:

0.27

MUB:

0.40

Martin Ratio

ITM:

1.86

MUB:

1.75

Ulcer Index

ITM:

1.13%

MUB:

1.05%

Daily Std Dev

ITM:

3.79%

MUB:

3.76%

Max Drawdown

ITM:

-24.75%

MUB:

-13.68%

Current Drawdown

ITM:

-4.05%

MUB:

-1.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITM achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than MUB's 0.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ITM having a 2.03% annualized return and MUB not far ahead at 2.08%.


ITM

YTD

0.46%

1M

1.05%

6M

0.66%

1Y

2.18%

5Y*

0.06%

10Y*

2.03%

MUB

YTD

0.41%

1M

0.71%

6M

0.29%

1Y

1.95%

5Y*

0.64%

10Y*

2.08%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ITM vs. MUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITM has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than MUB's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
Expense ratio chart for ITM: current value at 0.24% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.24%
Expense ratio chart for MUB: current value at 0.07% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.07%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ITM vs. MUB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ITM is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ITM is 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ITM is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ITM is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ITM is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ITM is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

MUB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MUB is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MUB is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MUB is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MUB is 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MUB is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MUB is 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ITM vs. MUB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ITM, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.560.49
The chart of Sortino ratio for ITM, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.810.70
The chart of Omega ratio for ITM, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.101.09
The chart of Calmar ratio for ITM, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.270.40
The chart of Martin ratio for ITM, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.861.75
ITM
MUB

The current ITM Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the MUB Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITM and MUB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.56
0.49
ITM
MUB

Dividends

ITM vs. MUB - Dividend Comparison

ITM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, less than MUB's 3.01% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ITM
VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF
2.73%2.73%2.39%1.92%1.70%2.13%2.32%2.34%2.21%2.29%2.27%2.43%
MUB
iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF
3.01%3.01%2.65%2.11%1.81%2.11%2.42%2.46%2.26%2.21%2.51%2.73%

Drawdowns

ITM vs. MUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITM drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than MUB's maximum drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITM and MUB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-4.05%
-1.20%
ITM
MUB

Volatility

ITM vs. MUB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) is 1.01%, while iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that ITM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.01%
1.12%
ITM
MUB
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab