MXAPX vs. BLNDX
MXAPX (Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund) and BLNDX (Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, MXAPX returned 8.43%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for BLNDX. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MXAPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for BLNDX.
Performance
MXAPX vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MXAPX having a 12.42% return and BLNDX slightly higher at 12.64%.
MXAPX
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 8.47%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.92%
BLNDX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- YTD
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 28.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MXAPX vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXAPX Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund | 12.42% | 17.41% | 11.49% | 17.41% | -16.14% | 19.63% | 11.52% | 0.34% |
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional | 12.64% | 4.12% | 13.11% | 5.79% | 3.71% | 20.16% | 16.30% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXAPX and BLNDX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between MXAPX and BLNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXAPX vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank
MXAPX
BLNDX
MXAPX vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXAPX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.35 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 3.59 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | 11.13 | -5.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXAPX vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXAPX drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXAPX and BLNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXAPX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -17.69% | -53.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -7.24% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | -17.69% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.50% | -17.69% | -14.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -4.96% | +4.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.34% | -3.23% | -25.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.34% | +1.12% |
Volatility
MXAPX vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) at 2.78%. This indicates that MXAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXAPX | BLNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 2.78% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 9.74% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.11% | 13.01% | +5.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 11.63% | +6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.59% | 11.76% | +7.83% |
MXAPX vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXAPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXAPX vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison
MXAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than BLNDX's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional | 0.65% | 0.73% | 5.74% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 6.11% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MXAPX Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund | 8.00% | 8.99% | 8.09% | 5.68% | 13.27% | 13.88% | 4.31% | 14.52% | 15.76% | 6.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXAPX and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MXAPX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to BLNDX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXAPX dropped -70.73% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.
BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXAPX and BLNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer