MXAPX vs. MXBPX
MXAPX (Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund) and MXBPX (Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Great-West. Over the past 10 years, MXAPX returned 9.36%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for MXBPX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MXAPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for MXBPX.
Performance
MXAPX vs. MXBPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXAPX achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly higher than MXBPX's 8.98% return. Over the past 10 years, MXAPX has outperformed MXBPX with an annualized return of 9.36%, while MXBPX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.91% annualized return.
MXAPX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 11.17%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
MXBPX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 18.06%
- 3Y*
- 13.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.81%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
MXAPX vs. MXBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXAPX Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund | 11.92% | 17.41% | 11.49% | 17.41% | -16.14% | 19.63% | 11.52% | 25.35% | -12.94% | 19.22% |
MXBPX Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund | 8.98% | 13.78% | 9.00% | 13.96% | -13.04% | 14.39% | 11.44% | 20.91% | -8.67% | 13.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXAPX and MXBPX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 1999 | 0.98 |
The correlation between MXAPX and MXBPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXAPX vs. MXBPX — Risk / Return Rank
MXAPX
MXBPX
MXAPX vs. MXBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) and Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXAPX | MXBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 2.66 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.29 | 9.22 | -1.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXAPX vs. MXBPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXAPX drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than MXBPX's maximum drawdown of -55.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXAPX and MXBPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXAPX | MXBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -55.80% | -14.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -7.12% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | -11.46% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.50% | -25.51% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.94% | -28.63% | -9.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.12% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.45% | -20.94% | -7.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.05% | +1.41% |
Volatility
MXAPX vs. MXBPX - Volatility Comparison
Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund (MXBPX) at 3.40%. This indicates that MXAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MXBPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXAPX | MXBPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 3.40% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 7.65% | +2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 11.47% | +6.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 13.49% | +5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 13.72% | +5.95% |
MXAPX vs. MXBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXAPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MXBPX's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXAPX vs. MXBPX - Dividend Comparison
MXAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.03%, more than MXBPX's 5.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXAPX Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund | 8.03% | 8.99% | 8.09% | 5.68% | 13.27% | 13.88% | 4.31% | 14.52% | 15.76% | 6.79% |
MXBPX Great-West Moderately Aggressive Profile Fund | 5.44% | 5.92% | 6.18% | 5.45% | 9.89% | 9.76% | 8.52% | 11.28% | 12.07% | 4.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, MXAPX and MXBPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MXAPX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to MXBPX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXAPX dropped -70.73% vs MXBPX's -55.80%.
MXBPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXAPX and MXBPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer