MXAPX vs. MHELX
MXAPX (Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund) and MHELX (MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, MXAPX returned 9.02%/yr vs 9.09%/yr for MHELX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MXAPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for MHELX.
Performance
MXAPX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MXAPX achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 18.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MXAPX having a 9.02% annualized return and MHELX not far ahead at 9.09%.
MXAPX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 11.02%
- 1Y
- 24.80%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
MHELX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 38.07%
- 3Y*
- 14.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
MXAPX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MXAPX Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund | 11.59% | 17.41% | 11.49% | 17.41% | -16.14% | 19.63% | 11.52% | 25.35% | -12.94% | 19.22% |
MHELX MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund | 18.72% | 3.45% | 12.51% | 16.30% | -20.27% | 14.07% | 20.57% | 22.49% | -12.76% | 12.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between MXAPX and MHELX is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 1999 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MXAPX and MHELX has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MXAPX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank
MXAPX
MHELX
MXAPX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MXAPX | MHELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.37 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 4.53 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | 15.21 | -8.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MXAPX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MXAPX drawdown since its inception was -70.73%, which is greater than MHELX's maximum drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MXAPX and MHELX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MXAPX | MHELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.73% | -61.24% | -9.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.15% | -8.52% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | -30.81% | +15.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.50% | -32.01% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.94% | -39.02% | +1.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -1.48% | +1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.46% | -12.91% | -15.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.53% | +0.93% |
Volatility
MXAPX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund (MXAPX) is 4.41%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 5.83%. This indicates that MXAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MXAPX | MHELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 5.83% | -1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 15.76% | -5.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.00% | 19.68% | -1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 21.09% | -2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 21.01% | -1.35% |
MXAPX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MXAPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MXAPX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison
MXAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, more than MHELX's 6.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MHELX MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund | 6.08% | 0.00% | 2.19% | 0.00% | 14.45% | 5.03% | 2.70% | 6.13% | 0.00% | 5.17% | 5.51% | 6.93% |
MXAPX Great-West Aggressive Profile Fund | 8.06% | 8.99% | 8.09% | 5.68% | 13.27% | 13.88% | 4.31% | 14.52% | 15.76% | 6.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MXAPX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MHELX has higher volatility (5.83%) compared to MXAPX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MXAPX dropped -70.73% vs MHELX's -61.24%.
MHELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MXAPX and MHELX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer