MVV vs. TNA

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MVV (ProShares Ultra Midcap 400) and TNA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - MVV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%) while TNA tracks the Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MVV returned 14.42%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for TNA. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MVV charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TNA.

Performance

MVV vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 26.73% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 56.90% return. Over the past 10 years, MVV has outperformed TNA with an annualized return of 14.42%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.70% annualized return.

MVV

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: 5.08%
• YTD: 26.73%
• 6M: 22.00%
• 1Y: 44.27%
• 3Y*: 22.25%
• 5Y*: 7.15%
• 10Y*: 14.42%

TNA

• 1D: -3.11%
• 1M: 9.59%
• YTD: 56.90%
• 6M: 45.88%
• 1Y: 125.39%
• 3Y*: 32.32%
• 5Y*: -5.98%
• 10Y*: 9.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MVV vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400	26.73%	3.48%	17.75%	22.51%	-31.96%	48.57%	6.20%	49.50%	-25.44%	30.81%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	56.90%	9.82%	7.21%	26.24%	-62.48%	27.88%	-7.82%	71.88%	-39.89%	39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MVV and TNA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008	0.95

The correlation between MVV and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

MVV vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MVV	TNA
Industrials	24.8%	18.0%
Technology	17.8%	19.1%
Financial Services	13.7%	15.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	8.0%
Healthcare	9.1%	16.3%
Real Estate	7.3%	5.9%
Energy	4.9%	5.4%
Basic Materials	4.8%	4.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	2.3%
Utilities	2.9%	2.7%
Communication Services	1.0%	2.4%

Return for Risk

MVV vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVV

MVV Risk / Return Rank: 46
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 39
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

TNA

TNA Risk / Return Rank: 65
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 50
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVV vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MVV	TNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	2.15	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	2.59	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.31	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	3.88	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.62	12.72	-4.10

MVV vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVV Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVV and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MVV vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, roughly equal to the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and TNA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MVV	TNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.54%	-88.09%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.68%	-32.53%	+14.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.80%	-65.78%	+20.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.53%	-82.36%	+36.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.19%	-88.09%	+18.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.08%	-33.64%	+31.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.50%	-33.92%	+13.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.15%	9.89%	-4.74%

Volatility

MVV vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) is 9.48%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 19.82%. This indicates that MVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MVV	TNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.48%	19.82%	-10.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.52%	42.69%	-19.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.88%	58.76%	-26.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.67%	67.57%	-27.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.34%	68.50%	-26.16%

MVV vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

MVV vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than TNA's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400	0.67%	0.77%	0.39%	0.77%	0.93%	0.16%	0.29%	0.62%	0.62%	0.21%	0.43%	0.17%
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares	0.38%	0.78%	0.93%	1.27%	0.31%	0.06%	0.03%	0.44%	0.36%	0.15%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MVV and TNA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, MVV and TNA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MVV or TNA?

TNA has higher volatility (19.82%) compared to MVV (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MVV dropped -85.54% vs TNA's -88.09%.

Which ETF is better, MVV or TNA?

On 10-year performance, MVV leads with 14.42% vs 9.70% for TNA. On fees, MVV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MVV has been the lower-risk option at 9.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MVV or TNA?

Over the 10-year period, MVV has performed better with a 14.42% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MVV or TNA?

MVV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MVV or TNA?

MVV has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.38% for TNA.

What is the main difference between MVV and TNA?

MVV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MVV and 1.05% for TNA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.