PortfoliosLab logo
MVV vs. TNA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MVV and TNA is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MVV vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

MVV:

24.95%

TNA:

61.66%

Max Drawdown

MVV:

-1.28%

TNA:

-3.40%

Current Drawdown

MVV:

-0.28%

TNA:

-0.72%

Returns By Period


MVV

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

TNA

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MVV vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MVV vs. TNA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MVV is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MVV is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MVV is 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MVV is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MVV is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MVV is 99
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TNA is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TNA is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TNA is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TNA is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TNA is 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TNA is 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MVV vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

MVV vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than TNA's 1.68% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
1.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MVV vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -1.28%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -3.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and TNA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MVV vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...