PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVV vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MVV vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MVV vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
2.97%3.48%17.75%22.51%-31.96%13.88%
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
1.26%19.36%17.34%43.32%-25.87%15.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly higher than QTAP's 1.26% return.


MVV

1D
5.86%
1M
-11.15%
YTD
2.97%
6M
4.17%
1Y
23.77%
3Y*
13.53%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
12.11%

QTAP

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.09%
YTD
1.26%
6M
3.74%
1Y
19.73%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MVV vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MVV vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVV
MVV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVV vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVVQTAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

1.22

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.07

1.94

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.48

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

1.73

-0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.50

12.34

-8.84

MVV vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVV Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVV and QTAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVVQTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

1.22

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.62

-0.39

Correlation

The correlation between MVV and QTAP is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MVV vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
0.83%0.77%0.39%0.77%0.93%0.16%0.29%0.62%0.62%0.21%0.43%0.17%
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MVV vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and QTAP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MVVQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.54%

-29.44%

-56.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.85%

-12.04%

-14.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.85%

-0.51%

-12.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.70%

-5.21%

-15.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.93%

1.68%

+5.25%

Volatility

MVV vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) has a higher volatility of 13.17% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 0.76%. This indicates that MVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MVVQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.17%

0.76%

+12.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.96%

2.75%

+21.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.27%

16.31%

+26.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.67%

19.02%

+20.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.33%

19.02%

+23.31%