QTAP vs. LITX
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX).
QTAP and LITX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QTAP is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021. LITX is an actively managed fund by Tradr. It was launched on Jan 26, 2026.
Performance
QTAP vs. LITX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QTAP vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.44% |
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF | 187.08% |
Returns By Period
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- 19.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LITX
- 1D
- 14.03%
- 1M
- -14.23%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QTAP vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than LITX's 1.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QTAP vs. LITX — Risk / Return Rank
QTAP
LITX
QTAP vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTAP | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTAP | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 205.09 | -204.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between QTAP and LITX is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QTAP vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison
Neither QTAP nor LITX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
QTAP vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum LITX drawdown of -51.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and LITX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTAP | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.44% | -51.46% | +22.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -30.67% | +30.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.21% | -15.30% | +10.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | — | — |
Volatility
QTAP vs. LITX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QTAP | LITX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.31% | 206.61% | -190.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 206.61% | -187.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 206.61% | -187.59% |