QTAP vs. LITX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) and LITX (Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QTAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for LITX.

Performance

QTAP vs. LITX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QTAP

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 1.89%
• 6M: 14.80%
• YTD: 15.55%
• 1Y: 21.33%
• 3Y*: 20.06%
• 5Y*: 12.50%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.79%

LITX

• 1D: 18.38%
• 1M: 21.83%
• 6M: 112.40%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF	$85.16M	$71.73M	$190.90M
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	$236.85K	$216.13K	$201.46K

QTAP vs. LITX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	14.68%
LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF	216.49%

Correlation

The correlation between QTAP and LITX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026	0.36

Return for Risk

QTAP vs. LITX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 97

LITX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QTAP vs. LITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF (LITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QTAP	LITX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.25	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.77	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.62	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	36.54	—	—

Drawdowns

QTAP vs. LITX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, smaller than the maximum LITX drawdown of -73.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and LITX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTAP	LITX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.44%	-73.97%	+44.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-49.75%	+49.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.91%	-25.48%	+20.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.59%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QTAP	LITX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.79%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.64%	199.88%	-193.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.94%	199.88%	-180.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.56%	199.88%	-181.32%

QTAP vs. LITX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than LITX's 1.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTAP vs. LITX - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTAP nor LITX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTAP and LITX in my portfolio?

QTAP and LITX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QTAP or LITX?

On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTAP or LITX?

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for LITX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTAP or LITX?

QTAP and LITX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QTAP and LITX?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTAP and 1.49% for LITX.