QTAP vs. QYLG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) and QYLG (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTAP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator, while QYLG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. QTAP is actively managed, while QYLG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTAP returned 12.65%/yr vs 12.12%/yr for QYLG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QTAP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLG.

Performance

QTAP vs. QYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QTAP having a 12.83% return and QYLG slightly lower at 12.38%.

QTAP

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: 12.83%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 22.41%
• 3Y*: 19.78%
• 5Y*: 12.65%
• 10Y*: —

QYLG

• 1D: -2.59%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 12.38%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 29.18%
• 3Y*: 20.15%
• 5Y*: 12.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTAP vs. QYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	12.83%	19.36%	17.34%	43.32%	-25.87%	15.95%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	12.38%	15.29%	22.02%	38.73%	-26.27%	16.06%

Correlation

The correlation between QTAP and QYLG is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021	0.90

The correlation between QTAP and QYLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

QTAP vs. QYLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QTAP	QYLG
Technology	50.7%	58.7%
Communication Services	15.8%	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	6.4%
Healthcare	5.1%	3.7%
Industrials	3.3%	2.6%
Utilities	1.6%	1.2%
Basic Materials	1.3%	1.0%
Energy	0.7%	0.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QTAP vs. QYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTAP

QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

QYLG

QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 71
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTAP vs. QYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QTAP	QYLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.70	2.15	+1.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.02	2.89	+3.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.94	1.39	+0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.04	3.48	+5.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	52.85	15.22	+37.63

QTAP vs. QYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTAP Sharpe Ratio is 3.70, which is higher than the QYLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTAP and QYLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QTAP vs. QYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, roughly equal to the maximum QYLG drawdown of -29.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and QYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTAP	QYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.44%	-29.98%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.49%	-8.42%	+5.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.03%	-20.75%	+7.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.44%	-29.98%	+0.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.70%	-2.94%	+1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-6.37%	+1.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.43%	1.92%	-1.49%

Volatility

QTAP vs. QYLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) is 3.03%, while Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that QTAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTAP	QYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.03%	6.71%	-3.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.94%	11.50%	-6.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.12%	13.67%	-7.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.92%	18.19%	+0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.72%	18.05%	+0.67%

QTAP vs. QYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLG's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QTAP vs. QYLG - Dividend Comparison

QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.69%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	16.69%	17.93%	25.27%	5.43%	6.91%	10.15%	1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QTAP and QYLG in my portfolio?

QTAP and QYLG have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QTAP or QYLG?

QYLG has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to QTAP (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTAP dropped -29.44% vs QYLG's -29.98%.

Which ETF is better, QTAP or QYLG?

On 5-year performance, QTAP leads with 12.65% vs 12.12% for QYLG. On fees, QYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QTAP or QYLG?

Over the 5-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 12.65% return vs 12.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QTAP or QYLG?

QYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QTAP or QYLG?

QYLG has the higher dividend yield at 16.69%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

What is the main difference between QTAP and QYLG?

QTAP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QYLG is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for QTAP and 0.60% for QYLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.