PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVV vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MVV vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVV achieves a 28.19% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 266.23% return.


MVV

1D
2.04%
1M
-0.38%
6M
17.10%
YTD
28.19%
1Y
42.36%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
7.80%
10Y*
12.98%
ALL TIME*
11.66%

LINT

1D
1.75%
1M
-46.62%
6M
135.02%
YTD
266.23%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$19.84M$20.02M$35.16M
$571.21K$587.07K$850.63K

MVV vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
28.19%9.09%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
266.23%5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MVV and LINT is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

0.45

MVV vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MVV
LINT

Industrials

25.3%

-

Technology

17.2%
100.0%

Financial Services

13.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%

-

Healthcare

8.9%

-

Real Estate

7.3%

-

Basic Materials

4.8%

-

Energy

4.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.2%

-

Utilities

2.9%

-

Communication Services

1.5%

-

Industrials

MVV
25.3%
LINT

-

Technology

MVV
17.2%
LINT
100.0%

Financial Services

MVV
13.9%
LINT

-

Consumer Cyclical

MVV
10.5%
LINT

-

Healthcare

MVV
8.9%
LINT

-

Real Estate

MVV
7.3%
LINT

-

Basic Materials

MVV
4.8%
LINT

-

Energy

MVV
4.6%
LINT

-

Consumer Defensive

MVV
3.2%
LINT

-

Utilities

MVV
2.9%
LINT

-

Communication Services

MVV
1.5%
LINT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MVV vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MVV
MVV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVV Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MVV vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MVVLINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.19

MVV vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MVV vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVV drawdown since its inception was -85.54%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVV and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MVVLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.54%

-69.02%

-16.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.22%

-62.23%

+59.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.40%

-24.07%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.19%

Volatility

MVV vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MVVLINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.52%

169.02%

-137.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.50%

169.02%

-129.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.28%

169.02%

-126.74%

MVV vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

MVV vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

MVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than LINT's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
0.74%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MVV
ProShares Ultra Midcap 400
0.68%0.77%0.39%0.77%0.93%0.16%0.29%0.62%0.62%0.21%0.43%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


MVV and LINT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MVV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MVV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.68% for MVV.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MVV and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MVV and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer