MVAL vs. IGF
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF).
MVAL and IGF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MVAL is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Broad Value Wide Moat Focus Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Mar 26, 2024. IGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Dec 10, 2007. Both MVAL and IGF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MVAL vs. IGF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MVAL vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | -1.89% | 14.17% | 6.10% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 9.19% | 21.31% | 13.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MVAL achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 9.19% return.
MVAL
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -9.73%
- YTD
- -1.89%
- 6M
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- 14.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGF
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 9.19%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MVAL vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MVAL vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank
MVAL
IGF
MVAL vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MVAL | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 2.10 | -1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 2.77 | -1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.42 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 3.10 | -1.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.09 | 15.62 | -11.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MVAL | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 2.10 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.24 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between MVAL and IGF is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MVAL vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison
MVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than IGF's 2.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVAL VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | 1.78% | 1.75% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.95% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.36% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.33% | 3.27% | 3.52% | 2.95% | 2.98% | 3.25% |
Drawdowns
MVAL vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MVAL drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVAL and IGF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MVAL | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.56% | -58.33% | +38.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -8.74% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.20% | -3.42% | -6.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -11.96% | +8.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 1.74% | +1.97% |
Volatility
MVAL vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 4.25%. This indicates that MVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MVAL | IGF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 4.25% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 7.33% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.82% | 12.73% | +6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 13.89% | +1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.58% | 16.81% | -1.23% |