PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MVAL vs. IGF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MVAL vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MVAL vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MVAL
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF
-1.89%14.17%6.10%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
9.19%21.31%13.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MVAL achieves a -1.89% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 9.19% return.


MVAL

1D
1.69%
1M
-9.73%
YTD
-1.89%
6M
5.21%
1Y
14.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IGF

1D
0.80%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
9.19%
6M
11.40%
1Y
26.64%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
8.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MVAL vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MVAL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MVAL vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MVAL
MVAL Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IGF
IGF Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MVAL vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MVALIGFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

2.10

-1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.23

2.77

-1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.42

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

3.10

-1.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.09

15.62

-11.54

MVAL vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MVAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MVAL and IGF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MVALIGFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

2.10

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.24

+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between MVAL and IGF is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MVAL vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

MVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than IGF's 2.95% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MVAL
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF
1.78%1.75%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
2.95%3.23%3.21%3.36%2.67%2.42%2.33%3.27%3.52%2.95%2.98%3.25%

Drawdowns

MVAL vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MVAL drawdown since its inception was -19.56%, smaller than the maximum IGF drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MVAL and IGF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MVALIGFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.56%

-58.33%

+38.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-8.74%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.20%

-3.42%

-6.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-11.96%

+8.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

1.74%

+1.97%

Volatility

MVAL vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 4.25%. This indicates that MVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MVALIGFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

4.25%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

7.33%

+2.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

12.73%

+6.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

13.89%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.58%

16.81%

-1.23%