MUSQ vs. GOLS
MUSQ (MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF) and GOLS (Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF) are both Communications Equities funds. MUSQ is passively managed, while GOLS is actively managed. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MUSQ charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GOLS.
Performance
MUSQ vs. GOLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MUSQ
- 1D
- -4.84%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- 6M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- -12.75%
- 1Y
- -8.84%
- 3Y*
- -0.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.00%
GOLS
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- 6M
- 6.08%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $118.16K | $131.19K | $97.70K | |
| $161.63K | $82.87K | $43.23K |
MUSQ vs. GOLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MUSQ MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF | -12.75% |
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 5.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUSQ and GOLS is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUSQ vs. GOLS — Risk / Return Rank
MUSQ
GOLS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MUSQ vs. GOLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) and Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUSQ | GOLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUSQ vs. GOLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUSQ drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, which is greater than GOLS's maximum drawdown of -7.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSQ and GOLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUSQ | GOLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.11% | -7.85% | -15.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.60% | -1.71% | -16.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.07% | -1.98% | -5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.39% | — | — |
Volatility
MUSQ vs. GOLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUSQ | GOLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.14% | 13.82% | +4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 13.82% | +4.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 13.82% | +4.26% |
MUSQ vs. GOLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUSQ has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLS's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUSQ vs. GOLS - Dividend Comparison
MUSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while GOLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUSQ MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF | 0.72% | 0.63% | 1.08% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUSQ and GOLS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUSQ is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUSQ is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GOLS.
MUSQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for GOLS.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for MUSQ and 0.90% for GOLS.
Find the right allocation for MUSQ and GOLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer