GOLS vs. GGTL
GOLS (Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF) and GGTL (Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GOLS is a Communications Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli, while GGTL is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. Both are actively managed. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.90% expense ratio.
Performance
GOLS vs. GGTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GOLS
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
GGTL
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- 6M
- 23.42%
- YTD
- 21.75%
- 1Y
- 30.73%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $246.12K | $117.91K | $50.39K | |
| $153.76K | $158.80K | $111.31K |
GOLS vs. GGTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 5.59% |
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLS and GGTL is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLS vs. GGTL — Risk / Return Rank
GOLS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GGTL
GOLS vs. GGTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS) and Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF (GGTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOLS | GGTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOLS vs. GGTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLS drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum GGTL drawdown of -23.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLS and GGTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLS | GGTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -23.65% | +15.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -6.25% | +4.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -7.41% | +5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility
GOLS vs. GGTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLS | GGTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.76% | 22.76% | -9.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 18.93% | -5.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 18.93% | -5.17% |
GOLS vs. GGTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GOLS and GGTL have an expense ratio of 0.90%.
Dividends
GOLS vs. GGTL - Dividend Comparison
GOLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGTL Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF | 0.86% | 1.04% | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.78% |
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLS and GGTL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.90% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GOLS and GGTL have the same expense ratio: 0.90% per year.
GGTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.00% for GOLS.
GOLS is categorized as Communications Equities, while GGTL is Technology Equities.
Find the right allocation for GOLS and GGTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer