MUSQ vs. RSPC

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MUSQ (MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF) and RSPC (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF) are both Communications Equities funds - MUSQ tracks the MUSQ Global Music Industry Index while RSPC tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MUSQ returned 1.11%/yr vs 9.23%/yr for RSPC. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MUSQ charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPC.

Performance

MUSQ vs. RSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MUSQ having a -8.65% return and RSPC slightly higher at -8.48%.

MUSQ

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 1.13%
• 6M: -9.08%
• YTD: -8.65%
• 1Y: -8.68%
• 3Y*: 1.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSPC

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: -1.00%
• 6M: -8.33%
• YTD: -8.48%
• 1Y: -1.59%
• 3Y*: 9.23%
• 5Y*: -0.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUSQ vs. RSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MUSQ MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF	-8.65%	19.60%	-4.94%	0.81%
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF	-8.48%	18.44%	17.98%	4.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSQ and RSPC is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023	0.64

The correlation between MUSQ and RSPC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

MUSQ vs. RSPC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MUSQ	RSPC
Communication Services	70.0%	89.9%
Technology	14.1%	10.1%
Consumer Cyclical	11.2%	-
Industrials	0.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MUSQ vs. RSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSQ

MUSQ Risk / Return Rank: 5
MUSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
MUSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
MUSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5
MUSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MUSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

RSPC

RSPC Risk / Return Rank: 8
RSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
RSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
RSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7
RSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
RSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSQ vs. RSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MUSQ	RSPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.50	-0.11	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.60	-0.06	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	0.99	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	-0.11	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.80	-0.25	-0.56

MUSQ vs. RSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the RSPC Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSQ and RSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MUSQ vs. RSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSQ drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum RSPC drawdown of -38.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSQ and RSPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUSQ	RSPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.11%	-38.03%	+14.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.11%	-14.71%	-8.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.11%	-14.71%	-8.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.77%	-11.30%	-3.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.91%	-12.69%	+5.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.81%	6.50%	+4.31%

Volatility

MUSQ vs. RSPC - Volatility Comparison

MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC) at 4.93%. This indicates that MUSQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUSQ	RSPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.64%	4.93%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.22%	10.28%	+3.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.47%	14.00%	+3.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.91%	18.62%	-0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.91%	20.71%	-2.80%

MUSQ vs. RSPC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUSQ has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPC's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUSQ vs. RSPC - Dividend Comparison

MUSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than RSPC's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MUSQ MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF	0.69%	0.63%	1.08%	0.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPC Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF	1.79%	1.66%	1.03%	0.98%	1.45%	1.10%	1.05%	0.90%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUSQ and RSPC in my portfolio?

MUSQ and RSPC have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MUSQ or RSPC?

MUSQ has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to RSPC (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSQ dropped -23.11% vs RSPC's -38.03%.

Which ETF is better, MUSQ or RSPC?

On 3-year performance, RSPC leads with 9.23% vs 1.11% for MUSQ. On fees, RSPC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPC has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MUSQ or RSPC?

Over the 3-year period, RSPC has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUSQ or RSPC?

RSPC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for MUSQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUSQ or RSPC?

RSPC has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.69% for MUSQ.

What is the main difference between MUSQ and RSPC?

MUSQ tracks MUSQ Global Music Industry Index, while RSPC tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for MUSQ and 0.40% for RSPC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.