MUSQ vs. XTL
MUSQ (MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF) and XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) are both Communications Equities funds - MUSQ tracks the MUSQ Global Music Industry Index while XTL tracks the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MUSQ returned -11.97% vs 97.96% for XTL. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MUSQ charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XTL.
Performance
MUSQ vs. XTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUSQ achieves a -13.09% return, which is significantly lower than XTL's 43.56% return.
MUSQ
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -7.39%
- YTD
- -13.09%
- 6M
- -12.45%
- 1Y
- -11.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTL
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- 43.56%
- 6M
- 40.96%
- 1Y
- 97.96%
- 3Y*
- 45.52%
- 5Y*
- 17.33%
- 10Y*
- 15.75%
MUSQ vs. XTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MUSQ MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF | -13.09% | 19.60% | -4.94% | 0.81% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 43.56% | 44.95% | 34.89% | 5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between MUSQ and XTL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2023 | 0.54 |
The correlation between MUSQ and XTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
MUSQ vs. XTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MUSQ
XTL
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
MUSQ
XTL
Consumer Cyclical
MUSQ
XTL
-
Technology
MUSQ
XTL
Industrials
MUSQ
XTL
-
Basic Materials
MUSQ
-
XTL
-
Consumer Defensive
MUSQ
-
XTL
-
Energy
MUSQ
-
XTL
-
Financial Services
MUSQ
-
XTL
-
Healthcare
MUSQ
-
XTL
-
Real Estate
MUSQ
-
XTL
Utilities
MUSQ
-
XTL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MUSQ vs. XTL — Risk / Return Rank
MUSQ
XTL
MUSQ vs. XTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MUSQ | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.49 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 6.70 | -7.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 25.85 | -27.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MUSQ vs. XTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUSQ drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum XTL drawdown of -37.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSQ and XTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUSQ | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.11% | -37.01% | +13.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.11% | -14.70% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.92% | -11.48% | -7.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -9.76% | +3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.15% | 3.80% | +6.35% |
Volatility
MUSQ vs. XTL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) is 6.06%, while SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) has a volatility of 11.31%. This indicates that MUSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MUSQ | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 11.31% | -5.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.98% | 23.63% | -9.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.33% | 30.22% | -12.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 25.38% | -7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 23.66% | -5.70% |
MUSQ vs. XTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUSQ has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than XTL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MUSQ vs. XTL - Dividend Comparison
MUSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than XTL's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUSQ MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF | 0.73% | 0.63% | 1.08% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 1.22% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MUSQ and XTL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTL has higher volatility (11.31%) compared to MUSQ (6.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSQ dropped -23.11% vs XTL's -37.01%.
On 1-year performance, XTL leads with 97.96% vs -11.97% for MUSQ. On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MUSQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XTL has performed better with a 97.96% return vs -11.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for MUSQ.
XTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.73% for MUSQ.
MUSQ tracks MUSQ Global Music Industry Index, while XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for MUSQ and 0.35% for XTL.
XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MUSQ and XTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer