PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLS vs. XTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOLS vs. XTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GOLS

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.42%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTL

1D
-5.71%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
48.37%
6M
50.63%
1Y
118.04%
3Y*
46.96%
5Y*
18.61%
10Y*
15.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLS vs. XTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOLS and XTL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLS vs. XTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLS

XTL
XTL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
XTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOLS vs. XTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GOLS vs. XTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOLSXTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.51

+0.21

Drawdowns

GOLS vs. XTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLS drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum XTL drawdown of -37.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLS and XTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLSXTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-37.01%

+29.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-8.51%

+6.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.96%

-9.76%

+7.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

Volatility

GOLS vs. XTL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLSXTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

29.67%

-16.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

25.22%

-11.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.56%

23.60%

-10.04%

GOLS vs. XTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOLS has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than XTL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOLS vs. XTL - Dividend Comparison

GOLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOLS
Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XTL
SPDR S&P Telecom ETF
0.88%1.05%0.62%0.80%0.74%1.25%0.88%0.92%1.90%2.08%1.11%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLS and XTL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GOLS.

XTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for GOLS.

They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for GOLS and 0.35% for XTL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLS and XTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer