GOLS vs. XTL
GOLS (Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF) and XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) are both Communications Equities funds. GOLS is actively managed, while XTL is passively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOLS charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XTL.
Performance
GOLS vs. XTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GOLS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTL
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- -6.97%
- 6M
- 29.05%
- YTD
- 36.50%
- 1Y
- 76.86%
- 3Y*
- 42.98%
- 5Y*
- 17.56%
- 10Y*
- 14.36%
GOLS vs. XTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 5.03% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 36.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLS and XTL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLS vs. XTL — Risk / Return Rank
GOLS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XTL
GOLS vs. XTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GOLS | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOLS vs. XTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLS drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum XTL drawdown of -37.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLS and XTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLS | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -37.01% | +29.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.87% | -15.83% | +13.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.98% | -9.77% | +7.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.83% | — |
Volatility
GOLS vs. XTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLS | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.78% | 31.01% | -17.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 25.56% | -11.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 23.69% | -9.91% |
GOLS vs. XTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOLS has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than XTL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOLS vs. XTL - Dividend Comparison
GOLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 1.28% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLS and XTL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GOLS.
XTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for GOLS.
They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for GOLS and 0.35% for XTL.
Find the right allocation for GOLS and XTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer