PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GOLS vs. KDVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GOLS vs. KDVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS) and Keeley Dividend ETF (KDVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GOLS

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.42%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KDVD

1D
-0.70%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
10.48%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOLS vs. KDVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GOLS and KDVD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026

0.55

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GOLS vs. KDVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS) and Keeley Dividend ETF (KDVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GOLS vs. KDVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GOLSKDVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.46

-0.74

Drawdowns

GOLS vs. KDVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLS drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum KDVD drawdown of -10.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLS and KDVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GOLSKDVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-10.98%

+3.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-2.35%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.96%

-2.96%

+1.00%

Volatility

GOLS vs. KDVD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GOLSKDVDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

15.17%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

15.17%

-1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.56%

15.17%

-1.61%

GOLS vs. KDVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOLS has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than KDVD's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GOLS vs. KDVD - Dividend Comparison

GOLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KDVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.


PositionTTM2025
GOLS
Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF
0.00%0.00%
KDVD
Keeley Dividend ETF
0.71%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


GOLS and KDVD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KDVD is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KDVD is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GOLS.

KDVD has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.00% for GOLS.

GOLS is categorized as Communications Equities, while KDVD is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for GOLS and 0.00% for KDVD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GOLS and KDVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer