GOLS vs. GXPC
GOLS (Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF) and GXPC (Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF) are both Communications Equities funds. GOLS is actively managed, while GXPC is passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GOLS charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPC.
Performance
GOLS vs. GXPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GOLS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPC
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOLS vs. GXPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 5.03% |
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLS and GXPC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLS vs. GXPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS) and Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GOLS vs. GXPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLS drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum GXPC drawdown of -16.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLS and GXPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLS | GXPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -16.59% | +8.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.87% | -7.34% | +5.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.98% | -3.67% | +1.69% |
Volatility
GOLS vs. GXPC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLS | GXPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.78% | 21.03% | -7.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 21.03% | -7.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 21.03% | -7.25% |
GOLS vs. GXPC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOLS has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPC's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOLS vs. GXPC - Dividend Comparison
GOLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | 0.31% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLS and GXPC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GOLS.
GXPC has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.00% for GOLS.
They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for GOLS and 0.15% for GXPC.
Find the right allocation for GOLS and GXPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer