GOLS vs. GXPC
GOLS (Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF) and GXPC (Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF) are both Communications Equities funds. GOLS is actively managed, while GXPC is passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GOLS charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPC.
Performance
GOLS vs. GXPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GOLS
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPC
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- YTD
- 4.06%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOLS vs. GXPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 3.97% |
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | 4.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLS and GXPC is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLS vs. GXPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS) and Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOLS | GXPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 1.42 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
GOLS vs. GXPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLS drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum GXPC drawdown of -16.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLS and GXPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLS | GXPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -16.59% | +8.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.29% | -6.90% | +4.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -3.08% | +1.12% |
Volatility
GOLS vs. GXPC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GOLS | GXPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 19.93% | -6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 19.93% | -6.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 19.93% | -6.37% |
GOLS vs. GXPC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOLS has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPC's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GOLS vs. GXPC - Dividend Comparison
GOLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | 0.12% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GOLS and GXPC have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GOLS.
GXPC has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for GOLS.
They also come from different issuers: Gabelli and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for GOLS and 0.15% for GXPC.
Find the right allocation for GOLS and GXPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer