MU vs. FLTR

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while FLTR (VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. Over the past 10 years, MU returned 51.33%/yr vs 3.52%/yr for FLTR. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

MU vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MU achieves a 188.53% return, which is significantly higher than FLTR's 2.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MU has outperformed FLTR with an annualized return of 51.33%, while FLTR has yielded a comparatively lower 3.52% annualized return.

MU

• 1D: -5.90%
• 1M: -20.26%
• 6M: 98.49%
• YTD: 188.53%
• 1Y: 655.32%
• 3Y*: 127.41%
• 5Y*: 61.18%
• 10Y*: 51.33%
• ALL TIME*: 17.06%

FLTR

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 2.30%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 1Y: 5.04%
• 3Y*: 5.95%
• 5Y*: 4.63%
• 10Y*: 3.52%
• ALL TIME*: 2.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF	$35.76M	$33.35M	$28.52M
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	$43.28B	$42.78B	$49.13B

MU vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	188.53%	240.24%	-0.96%	71.93%	-45.93%	24.21%	39.79%	69.49%	-22.84%	87.59%
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF	2.70%	5.22%	7.38%	7.41%	0.74%	0.55%	1.44%	5.70%	0.30%	2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MU and FLTR is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2011	0.08

The correlation between MU and FLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MU vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

FLTR

FLTR Risk / Return Rank: 99
FLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MU vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) and VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MU	FLTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	8.17	6.40	+1.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.00	11.91	-6.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	2.96	-1.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	16.92	16.15	+0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	64.08	95.31	-31.23

MU vs. FLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MU Sharpe Ratio is 8.17, which is comparable to the FLTR Sharpe Ratio of 6.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MU and FLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MU vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MU drawdown since its inception was -98.25%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MU and FLTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MU	FLTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.25%	-17.84%	-80.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.10%	-0.31%	-38.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.63%	-1.93%	-55.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.63%	-3.06%	-54.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.63%	-17.84%	-39.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.17%	0.00%	-32.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.02%	-0.67%	-57.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.31%	0.05%	+10.26%

Volatility

MU vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison

Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a higher volatility of 31.11% compared to VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.17%. This indicates that MU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MU	FLTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.11%	0.17%	+30.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	67.64%	0.65%	+66.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	81.13%	0.80%	+80.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.32%	2.13%	+54.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.42%	5.00%	+46.42%

Dividends

MU vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison

MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than FLTR's 4.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTR VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF	4.63%	4.97%	5.93%	6.07%	2.29%	0.63%	1.49%	3.05%	2.67%	1.69%	1.16%	0.71%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.06%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MU and FLTR in my portfolio?

MU and FLTR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MU or FLTR?

MU has higher volatility (31.11%) compared to FLTR (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MU dropped -98.25% vs FLTR's -17.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 6.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.